this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
35 points (88.9% liked)

Nintendo

18457 readers
39 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. No NSFW content.
  2. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  3. No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  4. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  5. No console wars or PC elitism.
  6. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
  7. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShadowCat@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Why go back to LCD after releasing an OLED for the Switch, surely it's better to make this one OLED rather than releasing it with LCD and then making an OLED later down the road

[–] avirse@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the number of people who won't buy it because of the LCD screen is smaller than the number of additional people who will buy it if it's $X cheaper at launch.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, you need a balance when launching new hardware. Most people, specially Nintendo players, don't care about OLED vs LCD that much. So, cheaper > OLED.

That being said, I am not trusting any rumours, or even checking them out, so don't know what the article says, but if they do go with LCD, this could be the reason.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If the console is to be 99% of the time attached to the living room tv, the inbuded screen matters almost zero.

[–] weedwhacking@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I use my switch in portable mode near exclusively, 1080p SDR (and usually the games run at way lower than that) are not pretty on a 65” 4K hdr OLED tv. I think most people buy the switch because of the portable experience and rarely use it on a tv unless playing Mario party or something like that.

[–] avirse@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

That may be your experience, my partner and I use it co-op on every game that has it and watch each other play singleplayer, so it's almost never out of the dock. I imagine many families with multiple kids and not enough budget to get everyone their own would do the same.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

‘Most people’ don’t have 65” 4K HDR OLED TVs. Also, from my personal experience a ton of people use the dock functionality extensively.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That's how I use mine. Only time it leaves the dock is when I have to change a tiny microscopic game wafer and hope to God I don't drop the thing.

[–] Lanusensei87@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The rumor basically claims the dev kits have an LCD screen, it could be subject to change, but developers need to know how their games will look like on the screen, so if it's true the kits have this screen, then the console most likely will have it too.

[–] TAG@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Are developers that picky? If they are releasing their game on any other console or PC, the game has to look good on everything from a 2024 top of the line 5k display to a 720p LCD TV with the color saturation set to 200%.

Besides, this is a pre-release dev kit. I am sure that Nintendo cared more about nailing down the CPU, GPU, and memory. I am sure that they will send updated hardware to devs closer to release. If they suddenly switch to an OLED display, it is probably not too much work for a developer to adjust the colors in their game.

[–] slimerancher@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Makes sense. But I am not trusting any dev kit rumours or specs yet either. 😀

[–] TheTechNerd@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It is all probably planned, so you buy it again for the OLED model

[–] TheYang@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

why would it be better for nintendo to not make millions of people buy it twice?

[–] Maultasche@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sony did the same with the later Vita models.

[–] weedwhacking@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No OLED, no purchase. No way they are doing this, I would be shocked.

[–] echo64@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eh, it'll be totally sold out for two years, they'll get their sales and then the oled model in 2026 will get them even more. This is nintendo. They do this.

[–] weedwhacking@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I hope they do two versions at launch, a cheaper LCD one and a more expensive OLED one. That would make the most sense I think