this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
32 points (92.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42335 readers
875 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What are your ideas, that if you could implement would likely stop our species from warring so much?

I'm asking for a reasonable ones, but if not - at least make them funny :P

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yinchie@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

As long, there are rankings in society, money, and power and human emotions – conflict will never end.

[–] pandarisu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's another rule. No wishes containing the word 'all'. Guaranteed ironic consequences.

I don't think anyone's going to miss wars.

Star Wars, Thumb wars, wow, Storage Wars!

[–] gonzo0815@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Democracies rarely go to war with each other. Add mutual economical dependency to that and you have a strong base to avoid armed conflict. The EU is a good example for that.

[–] Steampunk@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A global 'EU' is the most likely way to end all wars, yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Universal basic income, universal food and shelter and education.

[–] borkcorkedforks@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, most wars are about resources so becoming a post-scarcity would go a long way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b1_@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Send everyone in charge to an Enya concert. "We can sail, we can sail, With the Orinoco flow..."

An unfortunate combination of somehow achieving a post-scarcity, non-capitalist society with robust resource and population control.

But people are greedy and want "freedoms" that run counter to this.

If you see war as a struggle to get access to scarce resources and if you notice that currently humankind is depleting most of the available resources then you might come to the conclusion that if in the future we will not need to go to war something terrible must have happened. Are you sure about the future you want?

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Put the ones in charge to the front line.

[–] Alpagu@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think the solution is to have enough renewable energy for all of humanity.

[–] nafri@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

this is a bit grim but global-wide information control that shreds any information which will help the growth of the idea of overly patriotic but less enough to not kill the domestic culture (but i think, not necessarily always telling the truth). that will also promote the sense of global village and transnationalism. and relocate the idea of war to other rivalries like on sports or something, idk.

basically limit the free will without showing it. I can't think if it's gonna happen or this even possible.

[–] DaDragon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Well effectively, it would entail an all-encompassing global spying machine that gathers all data possible, and imprisons anyone who deviates from the expected baseline. (Wouldn’t end well for me either.) You have to remove most individuality to remove reasons for fighting. And even if you imprison 999 false leads to capture just one instigator, that’s the only way to ‘guarantee’ a fairly high level of security.

So what I’d say we need is 1984 or Мы levels of oversight to have any chance of curtailing conflict for good.

EDIT: oh, and re-education. Lots and lots of re-education.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Establish a global trade network in a way that everyone is completely dependent on everyone else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Education for everyone globally. War is, like all kinds of violence, an act or reaction of impotence (psychological term/not sexual).

It basically means nobody actually chooses to act violently or start wars. They do it because they believe consciously or subconsciously that they have no other options, because they can't think of any options.

This is always a wrong assumption, because there is always a better option. The difficult part is to getting people to understand their actual options. Education solves this.

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Did the last year in Europe fly by you unnoticed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deliverator@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Easy enough, we just build a jail so big that we can fit the entire world inside of it, boom no more crime.

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's (theoretically) impossible -- you can't break someone's (ignorant and established) will/ideas/plans with words alone or treats. Most world leaders are megalomaniacs by heart, i.e they won't stop until they are done with what they want.

[–] limpid_luster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Put everyone in a Matrix and let the A.I. lead the humanity

[–] tallwookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

i wanna be a coppertop

[–] encync2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Put everyone in a time-out until they can play nicely with the other children (because let's face it, a lot of them are acting like children)

[–] fernandu00@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Make those who declare war to actually fight the war. Put the two countries president on each side of an arena with some swords to fight to death, the one who lives wins the war. I'd record and pay pee view or something and the money raised would pay for homes for the poor in each country

[–] embit@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago
[–] JesusTheCarpenter@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It would take way more but the first step it would be to remove religions. And not only because most are not peaceful in principle but also because some religions see others as a target. Even small difference in beliefs could spark a vicious and long standing conflic, like Catholics Vs protestants.

[–] Dude123@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Post scarcity, de-population, or colonization of new worlds.

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Kill every human, or all but one. As long as there’s at least two people, there will be conflict.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›