this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
132 points (97.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
487 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] ira@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Interest rates had been historically low for a long time. Loans were cheap and venture capital was flowing freely. Tech companies could focus more on growing their market share with lots and lots of runway before they needed to become profitable.

Then during the pandemic, Congress gave a massive bailout to businesses. Inflation went skyrocketing, and the Fed had to raise interest rates to limit the damage.

Now money isn't flowing nearly as freely for tech companies. Loans are more expensive, and investors are more content to leave their money in high-yield bonds instead. Tech companies are pivoting to stop chasing market share and instead start taking their profits from their current market share, even if it means their market share stops growing.

[โ€“] fiasco@possumpat.io 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The other issue to consider is MBAs. Or at least the MBA way of thinking, that "caring about customers" actually means "leaving money on the table." The relentless search for "business efficiency," evaluated in pure accounting terms, can easily lead to destroying the core business due to a lack of understanding of how the core business shows up on a P&L statement.

[โ€“] Empyreus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Any company with a MBA at the helm always seem to make poor choices. Look at the all the companies that have started switching back to engineers for leadership they've started making comebacks.

[โ€“] shashi154263@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Have you heard of the story of the Geese that laid Golden Eggs? Yes, it's the same story here.

[โ€“] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You can provide quality services only for so long. Eventually quality will get in the way of profits.

[โ€“] mtnwolf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like they all see the inevitability that AI will drastically change the money model very soon. And it will not be to their profit, so best make every penny they can right now is their mentality.

[โ€“] SupportSparky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm wondering if it's a domino effect. Now that one major company made an announcement that fucks over their users, they're all doing it. We even now have YouTube cracking down on Adblockers. The Golden Era is coming to an end imo

[โ€“] N00dle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

This basically. Companies see that others can do it without consequences and so they do too. The age of acting like your "friend" is over and they are gonna squeeze ever last cent they can from users. Twitter, Reddit , YouTube, discord. I expect to see smaller players doing the same soon.

[โ€“] Floon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cory Doctorow termed it "Enshittification", and wrote about the process here: https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/#hey-guys

I'm glad I read through the whole thing.

Bummed that I won't be winning a testicle ๐Ÿ˜ฐ

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Check out Cory Doctorow's post on a term he coined called enshittification.

[โ€“] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interest rates go up. Quantitative Easing go down.

They might have to play with real money lol

This is it. For nearly 15 years money was basically free for tech companies. Banks don't pay anything, bonds don't pay anything, the stock market is overheated and investors are still looking for return. So if your tech company was already public you could borrow in the form of bank loans or bonds for dirt cheap and if it was still privately held you can get money from individual and corporate investors.

Now that the free money era is over a lot of companies have had to finally think about making a profit so that they can keep the lights on. This is why there have been tens of thousands laid off in the tech sector in the last year or so.

As far as Reddit goes I have no idea what they've been thinking. It seems like they've been spending money developing features nobody wants or needs: locally hosted images and video which have to cost a fortune, live chat, and NFTs, to name a few. They've got the ~20th most popular website in the world with millions of daily active users and they can't figure out how to make it profitable?

The API the third party applications used doesn't serve ads. All they had to do for a bump in revenue is to insert ads and require third party applications to display them or risk losing their API access. Users would grumble but it's a pretty reasonable ask. The fact that they didn't do this demonstrates to me that they don't think the money is in serving ads, they think it's in data mining and they can only get the data they want from the official app.

[โ€“] astro@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

capitalism โ€” they want more money

[โ€“] http404@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[โ€“] TwoGems@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[โ€“] dingus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Money. It really is that simple.

Reddit wanted to kill third party apps because they have ad blocking features and don't show unwarranted sponsored posts. Reddit wants to serve users as much ads and sponsored content as possible, which was not really able to happen with third party apps.

[โ€“] TwoGems@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[โ€“] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Dr. Capitalism, or How I listened to stop worrying and love the dollar.

[โ€“] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] Jaximus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stupidity and greed, a great combination!

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] roo@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago

Billionaires are circlejerking all push backs against wealth redistribution mechanisms. They want to use the fallout of any apparent mechanism shutdown as swag within billionaire soundbite circles. The ultimate tool is a flamethrower, or something similar. It's all a flex!

Sycophants, cronies, and useful idiots will be doing shout outs on handouts, commies, vox populi, failures, freaks, basket cases, lay offs, recessions, leftists, parasites, leaners, blah, blah, blah -- weird ass rich people lickboot enshittifications.

[โ€“] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Ultimately a for-profit social platform can only make money via advertising. If you are depending on advertisers to be profitable you become beholden to those advertisers. Advertisers do not care about "community," "sustainability," or what made the platform attractive to users in the first place. But they do care about "public perception," and "number of users," and most importantly number of impressions per user, per hour. The advertisers customers care about things that hurt their branch, so they dont' want NSFW content, they don't want violent content, they don't want controversial content, they don't want anti-capitalist content, they want "quality" impressions.

So if you are twitter or reddit, or facebook, or whatever, if your advertisers make a demand that will piss off your users and make it worse for them you will always do it and you will continue to do it until the platform dies.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ