this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
68 points (93.6% liked)

3DPrinting

15577 readers
221 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I had some missing LEGO bits, so I found the components on ldraw.org, converted to STL with LDView, and butchered them together with Fusion360.

In this case, I merged 3 parts into one, so I'd only have to deal with 1 interface instead of 5. The sanding probably made it worse.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tbe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Wet sanding (with appropriate sandpaper) makes a huge difference, especially for smaller grid sizes.

But it’s probably easier to just get some individual pieces from Bricklink.

[–] Takuwalker@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know it's not the point of the post but I still wanted to mention PrintABloks

These are made specifically for 3d printing and I just think they're cool and better for our community :)

[–] ThatGuyFromWork@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That and the creator of PrintABloks (3D Printing Professor) is a great and passionate dude

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Not really pirating IMO

[–] Maul535@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Might look better with a coat of primer and paint

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is the clicky-ness? Does it snap to regular LEGO well?

[–] p1mrx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It fits well enough to hang upside down, but I didn't do much fine tuning. https://github.com/paulirotta/PELA-blocks#calibrate would probably work better for generic brick shapes.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did you print it with?

[–] p1mrx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ender 3 S1, with Klipper on a Raspberry Pi.

[–] eric5949@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how it would turn out with a resin printer.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

This is the way, if you want small details, FDM is not your choice.

[–] Sleeping@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Due to the relatively small size and overall complexity/tolerances required for the object, I wonder how it would have turned out if done on an SLA printer.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah the tolerances on LEGO are high enough you really need a resin printer for good results.

[–] WorstCase@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I had the same experience. While I was very happy with the "clickyness", the color and the feel, it just takes to long to produce enough parts (FDM with 0.25mm nozzle and 0.05mm layers)

[–] drudoo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I’ve had the same experience. Not worth it and too much of a hassle to calibrate for proper snap.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Seems like this would be better suited for creating a resin cast.

I've seen people 3d print Lego, bit it's usually scaled up to gigantic proportions

[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

If it was that easy, Lego would've gone out of business years ago