this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
551 points (94.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43948 readers
594 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it's actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that's really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] SethranKada@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Sentience in humans begins at 4 years old (mental age). I don't consider humans younger than that to be people. I also firmly believe that you have to have some form of consciousness, self identity, and clear cognition to count as a person.

A human corpse is not a person, a brain-dead patient is not a person, and a human with severe mental disorder should not be held to the same standards as other people.

Similarly, anything that does have sentience is clearly also a person, and should be treated as such. Animals such as crows, parrots, octopi, dolphins, whales, and some monkeys and apes are demonstrably as or more intelligent than some human children. They should not be treated the way they are.

As a side note, I agree with that other guy. Polycules should be allowed to marry.

Also, names in this day and age are useless, at least official ones. We have computers, we already use government issued ID for everything, having a name just makes things confusing. Just use nicknames, either created by the person or by agreement from peers and allowed by the person. The concept of a parent forcing a name on their child is archaic and cruel.

And finally, real life security is horrifying. I expected things to be like in the movies, where you need a special skill or training to do those spy shit. But no. In comparison to real life, Google actually has good security and privacy. WTF people? Everytime I receive mail with my name and a description of what's inside just written on the box I cringe and go back to lurking online again.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Long distance vacations are irresponsible and selfish. We don't have the resources left to be wasting it on frivolous activities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] HellAwaits@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Tears of the Kingdom is overrated as hell. It's a decent game, but people act like it's the second coming of Christ or something.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] tallwookie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (22 children)

the world is overpopulated and everyone who wants to have children should require a license to do so (and it should cost a lot - like, a mid-tier job's annual salary).

load more comments (22 replies)
[โ€“] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

American conservatives have never been correct in opposing a liberal or progressive proposal.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People are judged more on their behavior than their gender identity or race.

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] Ciano@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Suicide is the most efficient way to solve all your problems. But I don't agree with people who commit suicide by jumping off a building or hanging themselves, I think they should do it in a painless way so they can feel peace in the last moments of their lives.

load more comments (10 replies)
[โ€“] Fisk400@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Nobody should be allowed to own land. You can build a building and that building is yours because you built it but you can't make land and the only reason you own it is because someone in the past used violence to take it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[โ€“] atrielienz@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

There is no moral consumption under capitalism. A lot of people think they agree with that. But simultaneously also seem to realize that they aren't going to change the status quo. So they don't try. It's actually that there's no morale consumption under capitalism but I have to do what I have to do to survive so here we are.

load more comments (6 replies)
[โ€“] gabbagabbahey@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[โ€“] Interesting_Test_814@jlai.lu 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

"This" comments (on Reddit and Lemmy) are not a bad thing. An upvote is supposed to promote valuable content, not necessarily stuff you agree with. A "this" shows agreement. These are different things, and hunting down the "this" promotes the "upvote to agree, downvote to disagree" mentality.

(For example I said "this" to one comment on this thread, which was an unpopular opinion I agreed with. I upvoted plenty of other opinions I found interesting (and actually unpopular) while not necessarily agreeing with them.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[โ€“] people_are_cute@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The rich will fight with all they have to keep their investments secure and rent/prices for common people soaring. They will not relent till the bubble bursts, if it ever will. But pop society has tried to "fight" them for centuries, not realizing it is a futile battle and that social class hierarchy is not something humanity can live without.

So instead of fighting those monsters, society needs to assume their inhumanity as natural and try to work around it, instead of bickering about it. The government should take steps to make socially positive initiatives more lucrative for investment and allow gradual reshaping of their portfolios over time from overvalued things like real estate and pop media to better things like green tech and accessible healthcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] johannes@lemmy.jhjacobs.nl 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Not everyone should be allowed to have children. Why? Because i believe my parents shouldn't have had children. But here i am anyway ;-)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ