184
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lickmysword@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 year ago

"The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and "face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed.""

Until the owner of streaming service decides to delete it for no reason or warning. These huge corpos can go fuck themselves.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 25 points 1 year ago

Or the label itself decides to remove them because of [insert reason here].

[-] helloharu@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I was recently looking for a song on Spotify that I remembered enjoying, what must’ve been 10 year ago. It had been removed from Spotify (greyed out in a playlist) but I sure as shit found it quickly on YouTube, uploaded by some random person.

[-] Skies5394@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

How many times have we seen popular games removed from Steam because of music licensing issues?

Hell, I had a movie I bought a billion years ago on DVD that I ripped to my machine as part of my digitalization effort, the physical media didn’t make it in my second to last move.

I then decided to move everything to h.265 to shrink my capacity needs and this one was eaten by the transcoder. I went to go BUY it again, can’t find it anywhere. Went to stream? Nowhere.

You telling me I’m gonna trust these rat fucks? No chance.

They’re just here to bleed us dry, the medium is only part that’s negotiable to them.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 75 points 1 year ago

Oh no, did the two huge companies hoarding the rights to the vast majority of popular music in the world while underpaying artists and overcharging everyone else lose some potential revenue?!

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago
[-] Hupf@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Way to !donthelpjustfilm, some people...

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nah, that tardigrade is having TONS of fun playing the world's smallest violin for Sony and Universal 😁

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Geezus, leave it to record labels and recording companies to become even bigger assholes than they already were.

[-] Janis@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago

if you pay for music you feed a system that starves the artist. dont buy music. ever. but their merch, go to concerts or support them in other ways.

[-] Nihilore@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Unless the artist is on Bandcamp, buy their music there. On bandcamp fridays

[-] dept@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 year ago

and with concerts most the money goes to ticketmaster

[-] Janis@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

in the US i heard its bad but taylor has enough to be no1 in aor pollution with that privat jet...so it might be still too much

[-] DieterParker@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

They named 2,749 sound-recording copyrights that the Archive allegedly infringed.

collection includes more than 400,000 recordings.

Has anybody the list with the 2749 recordings in Question?

[-] Olap@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Copyright law to blame here. If the labels don't defend it, then they could be sued themselves. Internet Archive shouldn't be in America though, far too stringent

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That's not how copyright law works. You don't have to defend it or risk being sued.

Copyright law actually has specific exceptions for libraries and hasn't been updated for the modern world, which is the actual problem.

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

You're mistaking it with trademarks - those you have to defend or you lose them.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
184 points (97.4% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2043 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS