this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
703 points (93.2% liked)

Memes

45637 readers
1859 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess if you don't know what a rootkit is it could seem like one.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the calmest, most insulting thing you could have possibly said.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Thanks, often that's what I'm going for.

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. This meme makes no sense..

Let's avoid misinforming people please. The reality is bad enough, no need to start lying and deceiving

[–] HellAwaits@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Memes can still inform (and misinform)

Yes specially if people don't know what a rootkit is. They'll think "ah, so this is an example of a rootkit, it must be because it is upvoted a lot, nice meme *upvotes"

[–] sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the meme has the right intention. Google WILL deploy a rootkit to make it make sense

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

While WEI definitely doesn’t qualify as a rootkit itself, any useful attester is going to require aspects of one - whether it’s a phone asserting that it hasn’t been rooted, or a PC running with approved SecureBoot and TPM keys.

[–] Spudwart@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s no way to say this one way or the other until it’s implemented.

However to “verify” a system from a hardware level to any decent level of accuracy would require kernel level access.

Technically you’re correct, until you’re not.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's still not what a rootkit is. Lol

[–] MonkeyBusiness@lemmy.one 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Spudward is on a fucking crusade

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, you weren’t kidding.

[–] LeLachs@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think it'll go that far. What I'm more worried about is that the spec calls for multiple attesters. So Microsoft and others might even make their own under the spec.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Every platform that has a vested interest (e.g. is, or is a large contractor of advertising companies) will likely want in on this.

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago

If the choices are in or out, any company beholden to investors or shareholders won't really have a lot of options it seems.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

They are trying to cut off internet access so only paying customers can stay

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Color me surprised that it's Google that created and pushed for support of this shit.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter if it goes short or far. This shit is DRM, and if any part of it makes it into browsers, it's the end of the web as we know it.