this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

news

23552 readers
847 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Kansas, some critics questioned whether the measure would violate free speech and press rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment...

But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 49 points 7 months ago

shakes grave of John Brown come back bud, we need you in Kansas again

[–] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 38 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever wanted to just be able to beat someone to death with your bare fists?

In minecraft of course.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 4 points 7 months ago

every day and twice on sundays

[–] someone@hexbear.net 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But critics of the bill, mostly Democrats, argued that the law could be interpreted broadly enough that LGBTQ+ teenagers could not access information about sexual orientation or gender identity because the legal definition of sexual conduct includes acts of “homosexuality.”

Are Kansas Democrats really this stupid, or is it part of the good cop/bad cop act? Isn't that the entire point of this bill?

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How are they being stupid for calling it out for what it is?

[–] someone@hexbear.net 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The stupidity is for pretending that it's a side effect instead of the purpose.

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think that could just be the phrasing of the article, most of the local activists I follow are saying its that straight up

[–] ComradePupIvy@hexbear.net 11 points 7 months ago

no they are this stupid. It is not phrasing. In Kansas the minority politicians are afraid to look even the slightest bit combative, or like the Republicans are not acting in good faith.

[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago

And I'm sure their age of consent is like 10. But that's for straight people.

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

is this driver's license shit or will the kids just click "yes i'm over 18" like they always have?

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 35 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I couldn't find the text of the bill, but from a different story: "The bill would not require a specific method of age verification, only outlining that sites could use any "commercially reasonable method” approved by the Kansas attorney general."

And if you haven't heard of our piece of shit AG: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kris_Kobach "As Secretary of State of Kansas, Kobach implemented some of the strictest voter identification laws in the history of the United States and fought to remove nearly 20,000 registered voters from the state's voter rolls."

[–] JohnBrownNote@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

lol he can get in the woodchipper along with the people voting for it, but that's probably just gonna be a button like all the porn sites.

[–] HexbearGPT@hexbear.net 30 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Praying for the woodchipper option.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago

Several states have already passed bills like this and the response of actual porn sites was to just geoblock the whole state. This results in a noticable spike in searches for "VPN" in those states the day the law went into effect. The latest one was Texas.

[–] SacredExcrement@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I forgot Kobach won the AG election

Absolute clown that managed to try (and fail) at attesting that there is widespread voter fraud, then got pantsed by a Dem in the gubernatorial

[–] Rx_Hawk@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

I would say I'm amazed his political career is still alive, but... gestures broadly

[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The porn industry is a cancer and its increasing normalization has disgusting side effects. This isn’t really going to do anything about that though.

Honestly, introducing children to lgbt material would probably help lessen the hyper-misogyny that leads to them looking at porn reflecting that. Showing young men that there’s a whole range of how they express themselves and their feelings towards people would do wonders instead of the usual “hit the gym and clean your room” advice

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 7 points 7 months ago

What this does is set people back decades in social and emotional development. They want to put everyone back in the closet. They think being queer is a kink or manufactured. The only prefrence is being honest with one's self and others. The state Ministry of Truth will claim any site existing stating queers exist as a p0rn gateway and prosecute people. Which will be funny to see them lose their case.

I hope this is brought up on 1st amendment rights. I hope the state is sued out of a shit ton of money.