President Macron says France and its allies 'could have stopped' the 1994 Rwanda genocide (apnews.com)

submitted 7 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that France and its allies could have stopped the 1994 Rwanda genocide but lacked the will to do so, a strong declaration ahead of the African country’s 30th anniversary of the slaughter that left over 800,000 people dead.

Macron’s office said in a statement that the French president will release a video on social media on Sunday as Rwanda marks the solemn commemoration of the genocide.

In the video, Macron says that “France, which could have stopped the genocide with its Western and African allies, lacked the will to do so.”

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] Ashiette@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

And they could have done the same in Palestine... They just don't have the will. History is repeating itself.

[-] livus@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

Macron will recall that when the genocide started, “the international community had the means to know and to take actions” based on the knowledge about genocides that had been revealed by survivors of the Armenian genocide and the Holocaust

Is the speechwriter tone-deaf, or are they intentionally making an ironic point about the current international genocide situation?

[-] windie@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Now they have the opportunity to stop another one, but lack the will to do so.

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is not the time for reflection and regret. It is the time to inaction, you need at least 20 years for reflection and regret.

[-] xdr@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 months ago

Oh our hands were tied. What could we do. We couldnt anger Israelis. God forbid

[-] MamboGator@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Macron then rolled up his sleeves and tucked a cigarette pack in the left side and said "and if I was there on 9/11..."

[-] livus@kbin.social 11 points 7 months ago

France played a big role in the Rwandan genocide tho.

[-] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

TIL, thank you.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

PARIS (AP) — French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday that France and its allies could have stopped the 1994 Rwanda genocide but lacked the will to do so, a strong declaration ahead of the African country’s 30th anniversary of the slaughter that left over 800,000 people dead.

Macron’s office said in a statement that the French president will release a video on social media on Sunday as Rwanda marks the solemn commemoration of the genocide.

In 2021 during a visit to the central African country, Macron acknowledged France’s “responsibility” in the genocide that left over 800,000 people dead, mainly ethnic Tutsis and the Hutus who tried to protect them.

Since he was first elected in 2017, Macron notably commissioned a report about France’s role before and during the genocide and decided to open the country’s archives from this period to the public.

Macron will reaffirm that “France stands by Rwanda and the Rwandan people, in memory of the one million children, women and men martyred because they were born Tutsi,” according to his office.

In recent years, France has also increased efforts to arrest genocide suspects and send them to trial.

The original article contains 385 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] The_Cunt_of_Monte_Cristo@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

France could have stopped their own genocides.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Just slightly short of saying "we still don't care about brown and black people getting Genocided".

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024

80 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38968 readers

2272 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.