this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
372 points (93.3% liked)

World News

39011 readers
2743 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • In short: Transgender woman Roxanne Tickle is suing social media platform Giggle for Girls after she was excluded from the women-only app.
  • She is alleging unlawful discrimination on the basis of gender identity while the app's founder has denied she is a woman.
  • What's next? The hearing is expected to run for four days.

A transgender woman who was excluded from a women-only social media app should be awarded damages because the app's founder has persistently denied she is a woman, a Sydney court has heard.

In February 2021, Roxanne Tickle downloaded the Giggle for Girls social networking app, which was marketed as a platform exclusively for women to share experiences and speak freely.

Users needed to provide a selfie, which was assessed by artificial intelligence software to determine if they were a woman or man.

Ms Tickle's photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app's full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bahalex@lemmy.world 177 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I have nothing to add, just amused by the fact that a Tickle can’t get a giggle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] john89@lemmy.ca 99 points 7 months ago (59 children)

I don't understand.

It's okay to discriminate against men but not transgender women?

[–] prof@infosec.pub 83 points 7 months ago (12 children)

While I certainly agree with you that discrimination based on sex is unacceptable im most contexts, I believe that gender exclusive spaces, unless they hinder people directly, sometimes are a good thing.

My dad is a mental health professional and founded a weekly 'only-men' self help group. He found that some things they talked about there wouldn't have worked with women involved. That group existed for about 5 years or so and helped quite a few struggling men.

So yeah, unless there's any maliciousness involved, I'd argue that gender exclusiity is not bad in every context.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's a bit different. A little private group is not a for-profit company. The difference between not being invited to a family only event when you aren't family and not being allowed into a restaurant chain because of your race.

[–] prof@infosec.pub 27 points 7 months ago

The group I referenced had a paid membership. Scale that up and make it digital and you may end up with a gender exclusive social media app.

I get what you mean though, but I feel there's a bit more nuance than what you imply.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago (6 children)

More the reverse. If you say "Girls Only" and then exclude a girl, you've violated your own terms of service.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (57 replies)
[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 99 points 7 months ago (29 children)

Wow an app based on gender descrimination is being sued for gender descrimination. I'm shocked

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 60 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Wanna know how I know y'all suck?

Tickle is taking on Giggle for Girls and not one witty joke?

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

There's low hanging fruit, and then there's the shit on the ground that wild animals eat to get drunk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 55 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

This thread was fated to be a dumpster fire from the instant it was created

Edit: 6 people dont seem to understand what an unholy combination it is to merge: Transphobia, Misandry, AI, and somewhat silly names on the internet

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] homura1650@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

I'm not familiar with Australian law, but how do you get to "discrimination on the basis of gender identity" in this case. Wouldn't the case for that be a trans man trying to join or stay on the app? (Or a cis man for that matter).

It sounds like Tickle's position is that the app should be discriminating based on gender identity. Her complaint seems more like them discriminating on (vaguely defined policy ammounting to) assigned gender at birth.

Having said that, I suspect their tune will change if a trans man tried joining.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Having said that, I suspect their tune will change if a trans man tried joining.

Exactly this. I fucking guarantee they wouldn't let a trans man join and actively contribute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mdwhite999@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 7 months ago

Discrimination based on gender identity is basically saying I have been treated differently due to being transgender. She is saying that she as a transgender woman is being treated differently to a cisgender woman. Or that is at least how it works in the UK. I would presume Australia is similar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Wait. We’re unironically calling social media for women Giggle and then we’re surprised it might be sexist? April first was like a week ago…

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ms Tickle’s photograph was determined to be a woman and she used the app’s full features until September that year, when the account became restricted because the AI decision was manually overridden.

I'd love to know the story behind the manual overriding.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Apparently she defended trans people in a conversation, someone complained, and moderators got involved and manually overrode the ai. Paraphrased hearsay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (20 children)

I think she will win this. They didn't require a genital photo so what's even their proof? Arbitrary requirement anyways. Rules like that only leave people out. I understand the want for a space like that though. I hope this woman finds a space where she can feel safe.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you dont have to put on the red light

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›