this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
2934 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3157 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Yikes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkWasp@lemmy.world 284 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

“Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

Zuck: Just ask.

Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

[Redacted Friend's Name]: What? How'd you manage that one?

Zuck: People just submitted it.

Zuck: I don't know why.

Zuck: They "trust me"

Zuck: Dumb fucks.“

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

How the fuck did Harvard students act so stupid and give out their info like that? I thought they were like the smartest people in the US. 🤔

[–] TesterJ@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Most Harvard students are still just 18-22 year old "kids". Think of how dumb/naive you were at that age.

[–] Captain_Nipples@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Try telling that to a 18-22 yr old. You think you know everything at that age. Then you get older and realize no one knows any fucking thing

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

As a 21 year old I would be offended but then I remember I just admitted my exact age on the internet

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tau@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

smartest people in the US

The problem is that that is a very low bar to overcome

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

This is still I think the most telling glimpse into who the "ZUCK" really is. Looking at what meta has become, how it has operated... No matter how professional and respectable he acts.

This is who he really is.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mokoshark69@lemmy.world 169 points 1 year ago (8 children)

This is a reminder to lemmy users, that this new meta expriement will use the ActivityPub protocol, meaning that it can interact with other lemmy instances, please urge your lemmy instance admins to de-federate from this crap as soon as it launches!

[–] mnstrspeed@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago (16 children)

But why? Isn't the whole point of federation that we can interact with people in other communities? Don't we want these big platforms to adopt ActivityPub? Completely walling them off seems counterproductive

Not defending Meta, just curious

[–] clara@feddit.uk 120 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

this is why

there is a very good chance that this project by meta is the thin end of the wedge

(edited to include "the blogpost", link here)

[–] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Interesting and I'd say you're right. If you were to see a mass adoption of the fediverse (such as Twitter imploding and mastadon becoming the replacement) there would be an immediate attempt by the big tech players to gain control of it in some way. And this is exactly how they would try to do it.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] graphite@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Don't we want these big platforms to adopt ActivityPub?

No. We don't. The more hands they have in the fediverse pie, the more influence they have over it. The more influence they have, the more control. The more control, the more at the whim of their decisions you are. The more at the whim of their decisions, the more power they have over you.

This should be common sense at this point.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cstine@lemmy.uncomfortable.business 143 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Data this app collects: yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] PixelOfLife@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dick_Justice@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (1 children)

jUsT gIvE mETa A cHAnCe iN tHe fEdIVeRsE DuRRrrpH

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Meta rolling into the fediverse like the martians in Mars Attacks.

“Don’t run! We’re you’re your friends!”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, he's a big fan of access. May as well just make an extra category marked "everything".

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's the reason they wanted to make their own phone. They wanted it all

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnonTwo@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't that just...everything?

Like is there anything they aren't requesting?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Don't forget to report it inside Play Store. All of these permissions are not required, thus the app is breaking store rules.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] corroded@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I run a pair of PiHole instances for DNS on my home network, and I periodically check the logs and look up blocked domains that I don't recognize. Every single time, it's a service that provides telemetry for mobile apps. It's insane how much data apps try to collect.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I bet they said something like "we don't use most of that information, we just need access in case we add a new feature in the future that uses it". And then it'll come out that they've always been using it, and it's been associated with your identifying info. And then their server will be hacked (because the admin password was "meta123") and the all the info will leak. The modern internet sucks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moitoi@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (21 children)

I'm asking myself how people can accept these conditions. There is a huge work of education on privacy to be done.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] 47_Alpha_Tango@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well if you download a Facebook owned app you should expect this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExecutorAxon@vlemmy.net 44 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Why do all of Zucc companies terms and conditions have this air of desperation and grubbiness about them? 😂

No other services feel as slimy even though they're all doing mostly the same things.

Meta feels like you're interacting with a drug addicted stalker following you home

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lol@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zuck wants to know your location

[–] dopeshark@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Zuck wants to know everything 😏

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DharkStare@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They could have saved time by just saying "Everything"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 year ago

Do not trust apps like this. Facebook mined this shit without any warning originally.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Crazy thought, but people don't need Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, any Twitter replacement, etc. I.e. ya'll don't need 'social media'.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lol not sure why people are surprised

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anyone know Meta's track record with data?

It's got to be great if they ask for all this /s

[–] NoughtE@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Let's not forget that they were fined $5 billion for deliberately misleading users about how their personal data was used in regard to the Cambridge Analytica scandal that effectively swayed over 200 elections all over the world, including both Brexit and Trump's 2016 presidential campaign.

Seriously, everyone seems to have forgotten about that shit and it's fucking insane.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Johnnynobody66@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Fuck off Zuck you fucking weirdo

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What "Other Data"?! Want my fuckin horoscope Zuck? How about the results of my last rectal exam? fuckin hell

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Under_enrage@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

so what is the difference from Spyware and meta's services

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 year ago

It's gratifying seeing this because usually when I see these kinds of worrying data permissions it's because a service I really want or need is being held hostage until I agree to this false choice and I have to start figuring out whether there's some way around this or if I'm going to have to embarrassingly explain to someone why I can't use this service they expected me to sign up to.

But then I see this and it's for something I'd never want to sign up to anyway and it's just like a list of dodged bullets. 😎 So nice to just laugh at their bullshit.

[–] Savoling@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the general public was just aware of how much privacy they lose by downloading these apps, companies like Meta would never be able to get away with stuff like this.

[–] Faust223@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I doubt it. Most of the time when I point out to someone just how much data they're giving up the response is just "so what if a chinese person knows about me"

Privacy for its own sake has lost value with the younger generations. What we really need to do is educate on the consequences and dangers of the lack of privacy.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

It hasn't lost its value. Privacy is still important to them as it always was. It's just been distorted a bit.

Anytime someone acts flippant about privacy, ask them to unlock their phone and hand it to you. Look through all of their messages, emails, photos, etc. See how quickly privacy matters. Tell them to shower with the door open or go to the bathroom while you watch.

Tell them you'll accompany them to their doc appointments.

People want privacy. People need it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AllGoesUpMustGoDown@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why does Zuck want to know the browser histories of people on the internet? 😳

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] TicklishRocket@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a big nope from me lmao. Mastadon seems to have alot of the important accounts I follow from Twitter. Liking it so far, no algorithm playing with your feed, no corporate advertising (unless you subscribe to it), no blue checks spreading insane conspiracies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] harbo@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Lol fuck that, I’ll stick with mastodon

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›