this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
1 points (66.7% liked)

Canada

7206 readers
341 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Always has been.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Is there a list of those implicated?

[–] ASaltPepper@lemmy.one 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There is but it won't be released till after the election according to Freeland.

Source

Edit: thanks to ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca for pointing out editorialization concerns I've added a relevant quote below from the article.

Senior cabinet ministers wouldn't say Tuesday if the government is prepared to release the names of parliamentarians who are alleged to have conspired with foreign governments and to have consciously shared sensitive information with their agents — conduct that one expert says could amount to treason. There may still be police investigations into these allegations, the ministers said, and details could eventually be released as part of that process. But that raises the question of whether the voting public will know who's alleged to have engaged in such conduct before the next federal election, which is expected sometime in 2025.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

till after the election according to Freeland.

This is editorialized

You could have said that she won’t comment on an ongoing investigation and been more correct because this “Freeland said she trusts police to do their work.” is the relevant part of the article

[–] ASaltPepper@lemmy.one 1 points 5 months ago

You raise a good point. I'll change the original to include the relevant excerpts so readers can decide on the meaning. Thanks 👍

[–] northmaple1984@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

No, the list being released has been a huge point of contention.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I bet you both the Tories and the Liberals are up to their necks in this shit.

It would be nice if this caused both parties to lose terribly and left us with an NDP-Green-Bloc dominated parliament for a few years

[–] northmaple1984@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago

I'd be surprised if the NDP and Greens weren't involved either to be honest.