this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
246 points (97.7% liked)

Linux

48683 readers
360 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 48 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (6 children)

X Windowing System is used in XWayland still. ~~X11~~ Xorg is no longer needed. RIP ~~X11~~ Xorg, you served us well.

Edit: Thanks to the note in the comments. I obvously meant Xorg is no longer needed, which is the widely used implementation of X11 protocol. This always confuses the hell out of me.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 6 months ago (9 children)

With Wayland, programs still can't restore their window position or size. It sure would be nice if they could get basic functionality working.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 29 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Wayland is still incomplete, but that is besides the point I was making. X is still not dead, even living within XWayland, within Wayland. X11 is just one implementation of the X Protocol and XWayland is a new implementation.

Wayland itself is functional and working, just not 100% compatible to X11. The same could be said about X11, it would be nice if they could get some basic functionality working right; but they can't, and that is why we need to replace it with something more modern and better. I think Wayland is working on a solution for restoring window position and size.

When X was created, there was no compatibility needed. Wayland on the other hand is in a different position, where it needs to innovate, make it more secure and keep as much as possible compatibility to X11, DEs and window managers. It's just unfair to just say Wayland would not have basic functionality working. It also depends on the desktop environments and GNOME is often to blame for.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 18 points 6 months ago

It will never be compatible with X because they are different designs. X relies on a central program (server) that accepts commands from programs. It is also a mess as it was built during the 80s for 80s hardware. It was expanded over time but you can only stretch the arch so far.

Wayland doesn't have a server. You desktop talks to the hardware and then the desktop accepts connections from apps.

[–] TeryVeneno@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

GNOME catching a devious stray there for no reason

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That does not seem to be a stray and yes there's definitely reasons to take potshots at Gnome. They still don't support server-side decorations. Everyone is absolutely fine with them not wanting to use them in their own apps, have them draw window decorations themselves, and every other DE lets gnome apps do exactly that, but Gnome is steadfastly and pointlessly refusing to draw decorations for apps which don't want to draw their own decorations. It'd be like a hundred straight-forward lines of code for them.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to breakage you have to expect when running Gnome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh noooooooo not a single QOL feature

[–] ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today 13 points 6 months ago (11 children)

And Wayland accessibility is very bad.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

that's not basic funcionality

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago

This is undesired behavior, it should be controlled by window managers not applications

I for one want my windows tiled and tabbed

[–] Zamundaaa@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 6 months ago

Of course apps can and do restore their window sizes. Don't spread misinformation

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

Programs can't set position or size of windows, period, at most they can ask and then hope they don't get ignored and it's good that way. Window management is responsibility of the compositor, not of applications.

At least KDE has support for it that's about on X11 level, a proper-proper solution is still in the pipeline. And yes you're seeing right it's been there for four years.

[–] lemann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Explains why I was having issues with this in Gnome on my HTPC...

Ended up making a remote button shortcut to maximise and restore apps

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 6 months ago

If it ain't broke, don't fix it

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ELI5: what does this mean for the end user? Is there any simple test I can do with both to see this?

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it means that you have to manually reposition every single window, every single time. for any and all apps, by design

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I think you mean Xorg instead of X11.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 4 points 6 months ago

Yes, you are right. I always get tripped up with this one. Xorg is the implementation of the X11 protocol.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 6 months ago (3 children)

lol, Wayland can't even start a desktop session on my machine, whereas X11 has worked without issues since 2009 (the last time I ever had to edit xorg.conf).

Sure sounds like X11 is the one who's "dead" around here!

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (7 children)

Dead in the sense of development. ~~I thought this was obvious. But I explained it for you, here you go.~~ (Edit: I forgot to be nice. )

[–] zauberin@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

X11 is being actively developed, last commit on xserver was 7 hours ago, and it will probably continue being worked on for a long time

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

We even disagree on what "dead development" means. :D ( Edit: To add a bit substance to my reply, minimal maintenance is not actively developed in my books. )

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago

And almost all (if not all of it) is done by redhat engineers which will drop it when rhel 8 or 9 (whichever one still supports xorg) goes end of life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

That's not the norm

[–] doona@aussie.zone 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When was the last time you tried it, and what GPU did you use?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Wayland kinda is an x.org project in the first place. AFAIK it's officially organised under freedesktop but the core devs are x.org people.

x.org as in the organisation and/or domain might not be needed any more, but the codebase is still maintained by exactly those Wayland devs for the sake of XWayland. Support for X11 clients isn't going to go away any time soon. XWayland is also capable of running in rootfull mode and use X window managers, if there's enough interest to continue the X.org distribution I would expect them to completely rip out the driver stack at some point and switch it over to an off the shelf minimum wayland compositor + XWayland. There's people who are willing to maintain XWayland for compatibility's sake, but all that old driver cruft, no way.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Wayland is freedesktop's project and freedesktop is Xorg's project. But you are kinda correct.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SeikoAlpinist@slrpnk.net 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

No feelings either way, I started using X since the last millennium and have been on Wayland without problems (Gnome or sway, never anything more than integrated graphics card) for about four years now.

But I really wish there was an fvwm for Wayland. And Window Maker.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

Why is CDE not on the list?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have a feeling I will be on i3 for many many years given all the issues that I've had with sway.

[–] nonatrib@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Samueru@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, I spent a while reading the documentation on how to pin workspaces to certain monitors only for hyprland to tell me that it is deprecated.

Also an issue I noticed is that you can't move floating windows between displays with the move left/right commands, move left/right moves the floating window to the left or right of the display and no more, meaning that the window gets stuck at the border of the display and doesn't move more.

Also I couldn't figure out how to make hyperland run several commands in a row with one keybind, or how to filter windows with expressions, something that I do a lot on my i3config .

And my biggest issue, and this one seems to be with wayland in general is that it seems that it is impossible to set my displays to extended more, that is turn the 3 displays that I have into a single display which I use with some games.

i3 isn't perfect either, I actually had to fork it and apply a patch that fixes and issue that I have that hasn't been merged yet either.

I will list all my issues with sway anyway, hopefully somebody out there notices it and fixes them:

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/8000

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/8001

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/8002

https://github.com/swaywm/sway/issues/8191

And all these bugs are the result of less than 2 days in total of use of sway, there is likely more that I haven't run into.

I also had an issue that affected xfce4 apps, but that issue ended up being a dbus-broker issue that only happens on wayland for some reason lol

[–] porl@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

I have workspaces pinned to monitors in Hyprland and have none of the problems you mentioned. I use odd numbers for left screen and even numbers for right.

Edit: just took a look and can't find mention of the depreciation; where did you read that?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kristof12@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] CuttingBoard@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago

Straight Outta Compton.

[–] Zozano@lemy.lol 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Where's my upstream explicit sync lads

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

Should all be in place. Even nvidia driver support. It's one of the rare cases where I actually support nvidia on a technical level, that is, having explicit sync is good. I can also understand that they didn't feel like implementing proper implicit sync (hence all the tearing etc) when it's a technically inferior solution.

OTOH, they shouldn't have bloody waited until now to get this through. Had they not ignored wayland for a literal decade this all could've been resolved before it became an issue for end-users.

load more comments
view more: next ›