this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
113 points (91.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5472 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

A worm ate my memory of it.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, no no no, you don’t understand, it was the brain worm that did it! RFK Junior is completely innocent!

It’s understandable that you don’t understand, because RFK Junior sounds like an active garbage disposal with several pieces of silverware jammed down it.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Sounds like VP material for the orange felon/rapist.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

And this, kids, is why nobody can say sorry for anything. It will be used against you in court.

[–] aturtlesdream@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

Not in Canada, it would! Apology law

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yea, this article sucks because it reinforces people being afraid to be honest - even if it would help the people they abused.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That brain worm deserves to be forgiven!

That brain worm does not deserve to be president, nor to hold any other position of responsibility.

On second thought, the brain worm doesn’t deserve to be forgiven either.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 months ago

I ain't saying shit about deserving forgiveness. But SA survivors deserve whatever the fuck they need to heal or move forward... if their assaulter showing genuine contrition helps with that then I'm all for letting assaulters show contrition without punishing them for it.

They still absolutely deserve punishment for the SA though.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago

Huh? I mean, sure… kinda. But there is a major difference between “I’m sorry that happened” or “I’m sorry we did all we could” and “I’m sorry I shot your son, ate his face, and then mutilated the corpse.”

Context matters, and putting “sorry” in a sentence doesn’t magically make the sentence not an admission.

[–] 242@lemmy.cafe 5 points 4 months ago

So the brain worm can not only turn you into a fucking anti-vax moron, but can also order you to rape women?

Seems like every right winger in America has a brain worm of their very own.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Independent presidential candidate Robert F Kennedy Jr texted a woman who recently came forward with allegations of sexual assault and apologized for the incident, which he claimed to have “no memory of”, according to a new report.

Cooney accused Kennedy of discretely stroking her leg while they were seated at a table, asking her to rub lotion on his bare back and putting his hands on her hips and breasts.

Kennedy’s message to Cooney was reportedly sent after he publicly declined to comment on the allegations but admitted he is “not a church boy” and has “so many skeletons” in his closet.

That fall, Cooney kept a diary where she documented her life and an alleged incident in which Kennedy made unwanted sexual advances at her, Vanity Fair reported.

Cooney told Vanity Fair that weeks after the first incident, she found Kennedy in the bedroom she was staying in at their home, shirtless, and standing where her diary was open next to her bed.

In a third instance, Cooney alleges that Kennedy came up behind her while she was in a corner of the family kitchen and began to put his hands on her hips, making his way up her rib cage until he was touching her breasts.


The original article contains 601 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!