225
submitted 3 months ago by phneutral@feddit.org to c/energy@slrpnk.net

The head of the Australian energy market operator AEMO, Daniel Westerman, has rejected nuclear power as a way to replace Australia's ageing coal-fired power stations, arguing that it is too slow and too expensive. In addition, baseload power sources are not competitive in a grid dominated by wind and solar energy anyway.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Who would have thought a political appointment is political.

[-] Antitoxic9087@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

The political context here is that the Australian conservatives (the liberal coalition I suppose), who have been vividly against climate policies and renewables, are now trying to propose nuke projects on coal power plant sites. Many of these coal power plants are soon to be phased out with renewables plus storage in the queue for the freed transmission capacity, so there isn't really any advantages these sites can offer for nuke projects decades from now.

Of course, any realistic realization of nukes in Australia would be no earlier than 2040 (some even suggest 2050), by then they could already get 100% renewable in energy system easily.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
225 points (94.5% liked)

Green Energy

2187 readers
17 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS