772
submitted 1 year ago by inasaba@lemmy.ml to c/simpleliving@lemmy.ml
(page 3) 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

That also means massive unemployment

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's actually a good thing, assuming that employment wasn't tied to surviving nor thriving.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Aux@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Good idea! Let's just replace workers with robots straight away and they can live work free!

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How would business work? Currently a business's purpose by law is to make money. How would you enforce a different goal without going full centralized economy?

And how is trying to add less value more effective than internalizing externalized costs? For example, co2 is an externalized cost, one companies don't need to pay for right now, it's external to them. If we made them pay for it to fund carbon capture at 1 ton removed for every 1 ton emitted, they would decrease their emissions and the rest would be removed. You could do something similar for other ecological issues as well. What's the benefit of degroth over internalizing costs?

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
772 points (97.9% liked)

Simple Living

2509 readers
1 users here now

Live better, with less

Ideas and inspiration for living more simply. A place to share tips on living with less stuff, work, speed, or stress in return for gaining more freedom, time, self-reliance, and joy.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS