this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
376 points (97.2% liked)

News

23296 readers
3170 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota is a man of relatively modest means, according to financial disclosures.
  • In fact, he doesn't own a single stock.
  • Like other members of Congress, Walz even slept in his Capitol Hill office for some time.
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 126 points 3 months ago

dude doesn't give a fuck about the shareholders 😮 where are my pearls?

“oh no, he wont care if my stocks fall” - finance bros, probably

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 69 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Damn if a triple digit income is living relatively modestly I’m the fucking Buddha.

Must say though, the media is doing an ok job of selling me on this pick.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

POV: you’re on disability benefits, given 8k per year, and the government/ruling class treats you as if you’re stealing money and lazy

Also the ruling class/govt: Triple digit salary is relatively modest

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

The key word is relative. Relative to the working class? No. Relative to his peers, the many politicians taking advantage of kickbacks and insider trading? Absolutely.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

False equivalence. One is moderately paid and the other should be paid and treated better. Life isn’t a zero sum game and we can work together to make the world better for all.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well none of the politicians, democrats uncluded, have made any real effort to increase disability benefits in the past 2 decades. despite disabled people being homeless en masse

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That has nothing to do with Democrats and Republicans. It is human nature. Humans suck but we could improve that with some effort. Most seem uninterested.

[–] wunami@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't triple digit from $100 to $999? As in composed of numbers made up of three digits. That would be poverty level.

Current congressional and VP salaries are described as "6 figs" or "6 figure salary" as far as I've heard.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's still good but they generally have to keep two residences: one on their state and one in/near DC. That's not cheap.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He told the New York Post in 2018 that he shared an apartment in Washington, DC, with Rep. Patrick Murphy — each paying $1,800 a month

$22,000 a year out of $174,000. It's not 'cheap', but I'd do it in a heartbeat if it meant I got such a payrise.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Me neither, Tim. Never have, never plan to buy any. If somehow I inherit some stock, I won't know what to do with it.

[–] dan@upvote.au 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Do you have a retirement account like a 401k or IRA? That's almost certainly invested in stock.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's honestly terrible finances unless you have a pension like Walz

[–] SpermHowitzer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

Worth keeping in mind his pension is definitely in stocks (and other investments too, of course). So he doesn’t own stocks, but the portion of the pension he owns is stocks.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I did, but I cashed it out for food and shelter.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

So you own stocks of food.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I do (2 in fact) and they're locked in. I can't do anything with them or to them except add more money (that I don't have).

I'd like to know who made the rule that RRSPs, 401Ks, etc MUST be invested in the stock market instead of GICs or other forms of investment. Because if I had a choice I wouldn't have one red cent in stocks.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

MUST be invested in the stock market

You can invest in bonds instead if you want to. Less risk, less reward.

I'm in my 30s so my investment portfolio is around 90% stocks and 10% bonds at the moment.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

According to the terms (both are from former employers) the stock market is it. I have no other options.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound right, are you sure? The choice for investing in the bonds usually looks very similar to the others. Not saying you're wrong, just that it is peculiar.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm Canadian, so when I transferred one of the RRSPs to my bank after I left that job, the bank showed me the paperwork that stated the RRSP had to be invested in stocks.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Ah, okay. I don't know how it works in Canada. In the US our 401ks are more like mutual funds. We have a few options we can choose. Many of them track popular stock indices (like S&P 500). Our IRAs can invest directly into stocks though.

I also don't know if you have to invest in the Canadian stock market or can invest in any, but there are definitely ETFs (which you buy and sell as stocks) that track bonds. So even if you can't directly get bonds you can still essentially get bonds.

The scope of this is a little more in depth than I'm prepared to write in a Lemmy comment right now, but you can get many different types of bonds as ETFs. You can get target date ones that are the closest to the traditional bond experience (guaranteed return if you hold until maturation). You can get ETFs that are a mix of government bonds. You can even get ones that are a mix of all types of bonds (including corporate bonds).

All that to say, if you must invest "in stocks" you can still probably get some that are close to bonds.

[–] expr@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you have a 401k, HSA, or other common financial accounts offered by employers, you most likely have money in the stock market. Usually it's an indexed mutual fund of some kind.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I haven't read the article, but usually when people like this don't have any stocks, it's to avoid a conflict of interest, but they do potentially own something like a whole market etf that's being managed by a 3rd party. Something like XGRO

That varies though. Some really do have nothing.

Edit: And while it seems like in this case it's true to the intent, technically, owning an ETF share isn't owning a stock. You don't own the underlying stocks with ETFs

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't own stocks. I just have a 401k and shares of VTI, VXUS, and VOO in my IRA and traditional brokerage. But I don't own stocks!

To be honest though, I don't see a problem (or at least as big of a problem) with politicians owning total market index funds.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

To be honest though, I don’t see a problem (or at least as big of a problem) with politicians owning total market index funds.

Oh I totally agree with you on this. There's no conflict of interest in that case so why not.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly? That makes me really concerned about his long term wellbeing and raises a few orange flags for how he can be compromised. Owning individual stocks is very questionable. Investing heavily in a mutual fund or some other managed portfolio is common sense for anyone win a position where retirement is an option.

But also? Fuck yeah.

[–] krellor@fedia.io 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Things like mutual funds, IRAs, etc, are not considered securities and are not disclosed on economic interest disclosure forms. That is true for most government disclosures, including in Minnesota. Minnesota only requires disclosing directly held securities, like stocks, with a certain value. E.g., if you own $10,000 in Apple stock, that needs to be disclosed, but owning $10,000 in mutual funds shares does not.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

He has multiple pensions from his different jobs.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 months ago

Before America made us learn to be our own stock broker, and change jobs every 3 years for a pay raise, there were these retirement vehicles provided by employers that you worked with until you retired that you didn't have to know anything about.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He has pensions.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago

Im surprised, he seems like a good person. So far the only critique I've heard is some people argue Josh Shapiro would have been a better pick.