The country has ambitious plans for fusion power plants to provide clean, limitless energy. Can they be realized?
Probably not, but it's good that they're taking the move away from fossil fuels seriously.
Their plan was always to use energy to become the next superpower. England built an empire using coal. USA had built their currently hegemony on oil. China thinks their shot to greatness is clean tech, so they produce batteries, solar panels, wind turbines and try to make a new generation of nuclear plants.
Everything you listed that China is doing seems good. Wish USA would lead, instead wasting billions on oil subsidies
The Deep State is not in a swamp but in a tar pit.
If you take a look at their battery industry, you'll see they're taking it very seriously
This is their best chance to escape their coming economic trap. They control so few actual resources beyond labor.
As an American I worry they might succeed, as a human, I actually hope they do, it would bring a true revolution by finally giving us cheap, safe energy, and hopefully it would scale down to let us democratize it compared to the massive capital sinks of current nuclear power.
As an American, I hope they succeed. This is a scenario like the old anecdote about why the farmer gives his best seed to his neighbors - we succeed only when we all succeed, especially in terms of environmental degradation.
Now, China's foreign policy? I'm still up for opposing that.
That's the thing, their resource constraints are the only thing holding back their foreign policy.
But I would still consider this a great gift to humanity and worthy of recognition.
This is their best chance to escape their coming economic trap. They control so few actual resources beyond labor.
Is that actually the case? I am not sure how many resources china has in their own country (I assume there are a few with it being this vast), but I think they are tackling the resource problem more so with their investments in Africa and other poor countries. And because of the war Russia also has fewer countries to sell to besides China.
I think the true longterm problem is actually with the cheap labour force you mention. As the standard of living rises, so do wages. And more importantly they'll experience the same demographic shift other developed countries are currently experiencing with an aging population. With the difference that it'll be worse for them due to the one child polic.
You're right about Africa, but they have further to go to really solidify their hold, though the west is sitting around watching too passively.
As an American, I’m fine with them succeeding. However I’m afraid we are deciding to throw away every opportunity that comes our way.
If we don’t lead in solar panels, it’s not just because China has a cheap labor advantage but that US decided it’s not worth pursuing. Same with trains. And EVs. And wind 🌬️ power. And a lot of electronics. And college education. And research. Etc
America is betting hard on the Hyperloop though
Profiting off of power doesn’t seem very communist.
Probably because neither is China.
You mean the ML and hexbears are lying to me????
They’re probably not lying, that implies that they’re intentionally trying to deceive. They believe what they say, I’m pretty sure of that. They’re just wrong.
Actually, if you look more closely the large walls should have been orange and not green! That's why it's not working. Also that's just one building. Did they not take pictures of the other ten supporting buildings? Espionage is about the details guys! C'mon!
Until their culture changes, and the pervasive cutting of corners in engineering stops, I wouldn't put much stock in its success with large scale ventures.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/