-76
Jill Stein slams ‘attack dog’ AOC after ‘predatory’ comments: ‘Democrats are running scared’ (www.washingtonexaminer.com)
submitted 2 months ago by UniversalMonk@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 months ago

One of the advantages of having no chance of winning is that you can say whatever you want without consequence.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

Running scared from......what exactly? Certainly not Jill Stein.

How fucking transparent can you be to issue a statement like this, then turn around and say you're not a spoiler candidate.

Fuck you, Jill Stein.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 months ago

"Slams", while avoiding the actual context and pivoting to attack on a different subject entirely.

Needs more Grassroots, not grass clippings.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

You already posted basically this same story two days ago.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago

Gotta keep up the engagement otherwise they don't get paid.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm surprised you didn't post the essay long comment about not being silenced?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I think it's funny they lecture about not being censored or silenced, but if you look at the modlogs for their communities they're constantly removing comments and banned posters.

How hypocritical.

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Oh is that cut and paste bullshit not spam? I've been reporting it as spam.

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

“Old woman shakes fist at cloud.”

I mean Stein is pretty spry for her age, but she’s still 74 and she’s sounding more and more deranged as time goes on. Honestly have to wonder how much of this campaign is her and how much is her handlers - whomever they might be (or whomever is paying for them).

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Washington Examiner - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Washington Examiner:

MBFC: Right - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/3143730/jill-stein-slams-attack-dog-aoc-predatory-comments-democrats-running-scared/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
-76 points (9.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world