this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023

98 points (83.6% liked)

Nintendo

18457 readers

39 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

No NSFW content.
No hate speech or personal attacks.
No ads / spamming / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
No console wars or PC elitism.
Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 7).
All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date

Mario & Luigi: Brothership | Nov 7 Donkey Kong Country Returns HD | Jan 16, 2025 Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition | Mar 20, 2025 Metroid Prime 4 | 2025

Other Gaming Communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

slimerancher@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world

CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemdro.id

picandocodigo@lemmy.world

Percentage Of Female Managers At Nintendo Hasn't Improved, Despite Pledges (www.nintendolife.com)

submitted 1 year ago by thorbot@lemmy.world to c/nintendo@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

According to Nintendo's annual report published earlier this week, only 4.2% of company managers in Japan are women. This is a number that has remained unchanged since 2021, when the company formed its 'Nintendo Women and Allies' initiative, pledging to "promote women’s careers"

top 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its a Japanese company and older than 20 years, such change takes time when your entire management is in their 60s or older...

[+] thorbot@lemmy.world -8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's not an excuse though. If you state publicy as a company that you will make changes, then it's not unreasonable to expect those changes to actually happen.

[–] avapa@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Japanese society is very old-fashioned, male dominated, hierarchical and “I’m older than you so that means I’m right”. Japan’s cybersecurity minister admitted a couple of years ago that he had never used a computer in his life. While I understand the frustration it is (unfortunately) not surprising that these changes do not happen in a timely fashion.

[–] 13zero@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Japan’s cybersecurity minister admitted a couple of years ago that he had never used a computer in his life.

Then he has never been the victim of a cyber-attack!

[–] Grangle1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is especially true when it comes to traditional gender roles in the workplace. Women in Japan are often only hired as secretaries or "office ladies" in big companies, basically to shuffle papers and serve tea. Not exactly big decision-making roles. Heck, even making an announcement is likely a big thing in this regard for a Japanese company, if they actually follow through they could really be seen as progressive by Japanese standards.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but when it comes to corporations saying they'll do things, its almost always just whatever garbage will benefit the company at the time, regardless of the fact they likely will never follow through.

I think the lesson is that you should never believe these statements about the future, the only times major corporations can be honest is if they're reporting something that already happened.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not really about believing them or not. It's more just bringing attention to their bs

[–] ClarkDoom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This isn’t BS… if you wanna just focus on that percentage, Nintendo would literally have to fire people to create the openings needed to improve that number or create jobs during a recession. Creating jobs in a recession isn’t really a smart option. There are plenty of things to get mad about in the corporate world but a company that actually creates job security and employs such a high percentage of older folks isn’t one to be up in arms about.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago

They said they would do one thing, and haven't followed through. I would call that bullshitting, I just think it's nothing out of the ordinary.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The changes occur in the hiring practices, but when the average time an employee works for a company is as high as it is in Japan you're looking at a decade or so to see the numbers move significantly.

Sorry firing half of the managers wasn't their move? Lol

[–] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man its a society issue, i know a friend that works in Japan, he has a boss that takes pride in rejection of modern technology, that guy believes everything more modern than a Nokia 3310 is shit, unnecessary and i quote his quote "that trend will end soon anyway"

You can only imagine how these people see woman...

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think its fair to look at the overall percentage. Instead, we should look into how many new managers got appointed and how many of these were woman. If that remains unchanged too, then it's fair to complain.

[–] Dalinar@lemmy.nz 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I did a quick google and found a Japanese study that said the average tenure for an employee in Japan is 11 years.

op it's going to take time for anyone to leave.

[–] KuroJ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly this. When I lived in Japan I worked with some employees that have literally been in that same position longer than I've been alive (men and women).

It's going to be a while.

[–] Dark_Blade@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s literally been 2 years, and as others have said, they’re not gonna start firing people or creating positions just to boost some numbers on a spreadsheet.

[–] planforrain@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

they definitely could but I would hope they are not because that would be tampering with the whole metric which just makes it meaningless and fuels haters

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it seems weird to pass over the top ranking candidate for a job (male or female) to fulfil a quota.

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

There are usually several people who are all similarly qualified for a position. People often get chosen for arbitrary reasons like being friends with the person doing the hiring.

[–] CosmicSploogeDrizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Racism and misogyny will not be tolerated. Everyone else is civil but we had a few reports in this thread.

[–] stephfinitely@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, ok fine, I'll do it.

load more comments