this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
1145 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2798 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 343 points 2 months ago (14 children)

Swift, 34, signed her post "Childless Cat Lady"

Well played, Tay Tay, well played.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 225 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 172 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Caption: Taylor Swift, wearing a black turtleneck, holding her dinner.

[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 92 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Many people say she was born in Haiti. Why won’t she show her birth certificate?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

Pretty solid response, all things considered. I hope it resonates with new voters to register and be engaged since the older folks are far too entrenched to move the needle.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 208 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Wow, Trump is having a really bad day.

It’s delightful.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 147 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

And its Joever.

Was honestly never any doubt Taylor would support Kamala. She is pretty publicly Liberal with a capital L and tends to care about things like autonomy for women and all those crazy things. She probably would have stayed quiet for ticket sales but then the trump campaign deep faked her and...

Said it before and I'll say it again. If you have to fuck with a frothing at the mouth fandom? Go after k-pop before you go after T-swizzle.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 97 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And in case anyone isn't aware and is taking advice from this post, don't fuck with K-pop. They'll fuck you up.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 50 points 2 months ago

Oh. K-pop stans will fuck your shit up and destroy any online infrastructure you have.

Swifties will fuck your shit up, burn down your home with you inside it, and piss on the ashes. All while their parents (and randos who got Swifty pilled by stuff like The Fall Guy) are grooving in the street and waving off hte cops.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 58 points 2 months ago

She probably would have stayed quiet for ticket sales but then the trump campaign deep faked her and…

She might have done something more subtle like she did with Joe Biden cookies 4 years ago. I agree, in this case she had no choice but to share her opinion loud and clear.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 101 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Couldn't give two shits about all these Pop Star positions. I do delight in this specific one because Trump's campaign fucked with her, and drew a line in the sand with regard to Generative AI bullshit in a campaign.

They deserve all the negative press that comes from this, and much more. I don't care for Taylor Swift, but I like this move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 95 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Look, I am not a billionaire loving guy anymore than some of you are.

But has anyone here considered that Musk has made an impact on the views of young white men (whom also happen to be Republican and Conservative or Proud Boys?

Does it bother us that these men follow a billionaire who doesn't give two shits about them? Yes.

Do I care that Taylor Swift is the opposite of that and encourages young women and men, be it black, gay, trans, etc to be opposite end of that spectrum. Fuck yes, we shouldn't base our views off the rich but has it ever occurred to anyone here that it is using those billionairs to represent and have them be vocal with the power they hold with our views instead?

I will absolutely take Taylor Swift speaking up and saying what she believes in and her giving that voice to 100000+ people whose only voice is heard in a vote if her speaking up also encourages people to say fuck Trump and and Musk and every fucking dumb ass on this post that thinks Taylor speaking out is a bad thing by comparison to it somehow being worse then what they already do with Musk.

Fuckem, fuck billionaires, but God damn keep fucking roasting them TSwiftie.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

If I had a platform that millions of people listened to (which I don't), and strongly held beliefs about how the country could be made better for everyone (which I do), why wouldn't I use my platform to share those beliefs? How could I not?

No one MUST obey what either of them says, just like no one would be compelled to obey me in my hypothetical. But I don't really have a problem with any person using whatever platform they've found themselves with to express their own beliefs and desires. I don't think people lose the right to free expression just because they are rich and/or famous and/or powerful.

Edit: And if you piss a lot of people off and lose all your advertisers because your opinions are repugnant and awful - well hey, that's the choice you made.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 91 points 2 months ago (9 children)

So of course Musk immediately threatens to “give her a child”. Like a normal not weird person.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Her statement was impeccable. She mentioned the AI generated fake image which appeared three weeks ago. This is the response that had to be made by her. She signed it Childless Cat Lady. Perfect.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 74 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now the Biden administration needs to follow through and declare election day a federal holiday.

[–] CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t that power assigned to Congress?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Average Americans and thinking the President is all-powerful, name a more iconic duo.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 2 months ago (9 children)

If Taylor Swift spearheads voter registration drives in swing states and Pennsylvania specifically, the race could be over.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Perfect. Now she'll do a voter registration drive.

Also if you've been sitting on a donation for Harris between now and the next 24 hours will give Harris another big news cycle bump.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 52 points 2 months ago

But I saw PICTURES that she SUPPORTED Trump! Her LITERALLY SAYING SHE ENDORSES KAMALA is Fake News! Trump would NEVER lie to me!

-Republicans who do their Own Research!

[–] sentientity@lemm.ee 41 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Some folks here really seem to think that her fans don't have any political opinions without her. This is actually as much about her politically engaged fan base wanting her to use her platform for good, than it is about swaying people who might be very young or unsure about voting.

Lots of swifties are millenials who lean left and liberal and some have criticized her in the past for not speaking up or for leaving her views ambiguous in a way that left room for the right to coopt her image. This is not about silly pop fans needing to be told what to think. People aren't ignorant. It's exactly because she's powerful and very wealthy, that it's important for her to use her power to be very clear about where she stands. Especially in light of the ai thing and the Brittany Mahomes weirdness.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Can't wait for Trump's reaction. I guess the pictures of support for him were fake, huh?

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 2 months ago

Dear Trump

We, are never ever ever, getting back together.

Sincerely, The White House

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Been waiting for this since Trump decided to attack her and her fanbase, and misuse her image without her permission.

Go on, you MAGA idiots, start shouting at Taylor Swift. I dare you.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Why on earth would he poke that bear?

Taylor Swift absolutely can drive voter registrations at levels that would easily supersede the 10-20k that swing states will be decided by, just based on her word. And her fanbase spreads across multiple demographics.

I'd be shocked if her announcement alone doesn't drive 100k registrations nationwide in the next 48 hours.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 months ago

Let flip some red states swifties

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It’s gonna be brutal when she’s one-upped by er … Kid Rock.

No! Wait, Ted Nugent.

Yeah, suck it Swifters.

load more comments
view more: next ›