this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
77 points (98.7% liked)

Marvel Studios

3012 readers
322 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios!

We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about Marvel Studios productions. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Related Communities:


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"So if there’s a good way to use her I’m always happy to come back, however they can make that make sense,” Olsen admitted.

"(...) I just need more, other characters in my life. There’s no longevity in one character.”

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I really doubt they're going to do the Agatha show without her at the end.

This type of article exists for that reason, reminding you who Wanda is just as a connected project is marketed.

Whether or not she's in it, they want you thinking about it.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

It is suspicious that Hollywood Reporter is publishing this article now, yes. But on the other hand it's just her giving an answer to a question she probably gets all the time

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I really liked Wandavision. But, in Doctor Strange Multiverse of Madness, they completely reverted her entire redemption arc, so now she's out of the MCU. For no reason... WTF, they couldn't think of another villain to use??

Edit: Sorry, didn't mean to reply this to another comment...

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She was corrupted by the Darkhold, which was made very clear in both WandaVision and Multiverse of Madness.

I get your concerns, don't get me wrong, but she is still there and can still be used effectively. She definitely did not just die at the end of MoM.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yes, it was made clear that bad book make do bad thing... but in the most heavy-handed irredeemable way possible.

Unless they use a multiverse Wanda, she's a mass murderer. Blaming it on a book doesn't change that.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 month ago

Her high point was almost taking care of Thanos. If she hadn't been bent on a slow revenge, it would have been different. I wonder if one of Strange's failed paths is him trying to convince her to just do it without making him suffer.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

And she's thinking about her imaginary boys!

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

"There's no longevity in one character."

Deadpools "'TILL YOURE NINETY!" line gets me here. You absolutely could have a character go a long time, but as she (and Jackman) said, it becomes how long you're willing to play them.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I really liked Wandavision. But, in Doctor Strange Multiverse of Madness, they completely reverted her entire redemption arc, so now she's out of the MCU. For no reason... WTF, they couldn't think of another villain to use??

[–] A32topsL@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Easy, just show/claim she was in fact controlled or possessed by an evil entity, say like Chthon, not just plain corrupted. Just like Bucky was when he was still the Winter Soldier. Just like that Wanda variant in MoM whom Wanda possessed to defeat the Illuminati back there.