this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
46 points (97.9% liked)

Showerthoughts

29692 readers
801 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have no idea how true this is? It is just a random shower thought.

It may be more true where I am in Canada than in the US? Here, senators are essentially appointed for life. I understand US senators are elected but have longer terms and generally more stable careers than their counterparts? In either case, there seems to be a lot of prestige that comes with the position.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

6 years per term, here, but no term limits. Combine that with name recognition, low-information voters, and "the devil you know", and they're basically / de-facto appointed for life, as you say. They can and have been voted out before, but it seems to be rare these days. Usually they retire (Manchin, supposedly), resign (Franken), or die of old age in office (Feinstein, Byrd).

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 month ago

Being ruled by gereatrics is grand. We got things like maternity leave and good health care!

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In the UK the house of Lords is like that but in Australia the upper house has 6 year terms and have to go for reelection. Seats change all the time. Very few are safe seats.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the Canadian system is very much modelled after the UK?

That's interesting about Australia though. Btw I understand Australia has a ranked voting system in elections? Curious about how well that works. Our first-past-the-post is a nightmare with vote-splitting sending the "wrong" representative to the capital.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ranked choice is first past the post with extra steps.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But doesn't it resolve the vote-splitting problem? For example, a common scenario here is you have a right-wing candidate winning in a a left-leaning district because the left's vote is split across more than one political party. Wouldn't a ranked system solve that dilemma once all the dust has settled?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure the guy you're answering to has no idea what he's talking about. Lol

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man the more I hear about how Australia's government the more I wanna risk the increased chance of skin cancer

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

don't forget spiders, snakes, sharks, crocodiles. drop bears

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I would 100% try to pet a dingo

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

A closer US parallel might be getting appointed to the Supreme Court.