980
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nednobbins@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago
[-] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Friendly reminder that my AI-generated image detector is available to use free of charge here: https://huggingface.co/spaces/umm-maybe/sdxl-detector

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Except these are very prone to false positives.

[-] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I find it very funny that people are so concerned about false positives. Models like these should really only be used as a screening tool to catch things and flag them for human review. In that context, false positives seem less bad than false negatives (although, people seem to demand zero error in either direction, and that's just silly).

[-] AsudoxDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Frankly, it sucks. Every input image I tried had over 90% artificial rating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
980 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

10654 readers
3794 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS