Technology

59378 readers

3229 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Anthropic Wants Its AI Agent to Control Your Computer (www.wired.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to c/technology@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] aisteru@lemmy.aisteru.ch 51 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Y'all remember when we found out all the AI in the walkout Amazon grocery stores was just a bunch of dudes in an Indian call center watching cameras? That would be hilarious if this was the same, some random dude in India sshs into this dude computer then gets annoyed about it if date packages on the system and it spirals from there.

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I see that Amazon Go nonsense parroted a lot here on Lemmy. It's not true.

Humans are involved in resolving issues (like self-driving cars that get stuck), and training, but it's not just a bunch of people watching cameras and updating a spreadsheet of your groceries.

The Verge has an article on the subject.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But if they’re having to manually edit 700 of 1000 orders, then it’s like saying “self driving but we have someone take over every 5 minutes”. Which is extremely misleading when they say “it’s AI!!!!”

[–] essteeyou@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's not clear that "review" here means that the original solution by the system was different from the human solution. Perhaps 350 out of 700 were identical, I can't say, but it's certainly not true that the entire system was just humans watching video feeds, and that's the claim I'm disputing.

[–] Klicnik@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 weeks ago

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

An impressive dead end.

[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

Dude forgot he's using a tool that's not going to think for him

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Boy am I glad all those new server farms are sucking up all the potable water...

[–] Zerfallen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Microsoft could have been ahead on this with Cortana if they had any real commitment and vision.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Their vision was to do screenshots every few seconds and start with that.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

Someone made a wrapper for it you can run: https://github.com/corbt/agent.exe/

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

I'll pass.

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago

No. But if anyone is interested in a opensourcer version of this check out open interpreter