94
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] notfromhere@lemmy.one 44 points 1 year ago

For everyone commenting outrage, a very reddit thing to do btw, why not try reading the very short article and try some critical thinking. Lots of bad habits from reddit have made their way over to lemmy, can we at least try to RTFA?

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Outrage seems common everywhere today. The good thing about it is that it lasts five minutes. And then they get outraged by something else. Oh, btw I had prescription inserts done for my quest 2 and the company required a prescription too.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's not good at all. All these outrages allow assholes to get away with shitty things. Unfortunately the media treats every story as the end of the world... And then move on after 48h

And that's why I rarely read/watch news. Usually the signal to noise ratio is a bit better on Reddit because I can avoid the worse subreddits, and I'm hoping lemmy will get there (e.g. I loved the /r/neural* series of subreddits).

This just smacks of stupid entitlement. Nobody is forcing you to buy the product and they're upfront about what you need to do to get one. I wish there were more hackable/open headsets at a reasonable price (I'm a Linux user, so open firmware is important to me), but they don't, so I'll wait until there is. If Apple wants a controlled experience, that's totally fine, I just won't buy it.

[-] GraceGH@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

prescription inserts done for my quest 2

How is that working out for you? I just use the glasses spacer on my HP Reverb G2 but I have considered in the past getting lens replacements if its a significant improvement in some way.

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

They worked great while I owned the Quest 2.

[-] cnqr@beehaw.org 22 points 1 year ago

Makes sense. I’m pretty sure many would otherwise give wrong, optimistic numbers for their vision and complain that their $3.5k device is not working properly and is blurry instead.

[-] Radio_717@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I guess it makes sense to need prescription data but its weird. Also if you get prescription version will anyone else be able to use it? Will there be swapable lenses for multiple users?

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago

What do you mean multiple users? Everybody OBVIOUSLY needs their own device! And if your eyes get worse with age, you OBVIOUSLY need a brand new device! Swappable lenses, pfft, what is this, Marxism?

[-] Radio_717@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How stupid of me LOL- of course its a one user device JUST like a phone. I’m sure that’s how they’ll hit 4Trillion market cap next years. /s

[-] rarkgrames@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Magnetic swappable lenses I believe.

[-] Radio_717@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

For $3500 they should have this.

[-] rarkgrames@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure the lenses cost extra. I heard somewhere in the region of $800 I think but I could be misremembering

[-] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would guess that the Zeiss prescription lenses for the Vision Pro will be at least $300-600 a pair, unless Apple is eating part of the cost given the already high price of the headset itself. — Mark Gurman (@markgurman) June 6, 2023

This is all I’m aware of, and it’s a guess. Personally I think every pair will need lenses, and if you have a prescription you get a specific set. If you don’t have a prescription, you get a generic set.

[-] Matte@feddit.it 9 points 1 year ago

didn’t they say during the keynote that the lenses will attach magnetically to the visor?

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

The inserts are magnetically attached so you can swap ‘em. They said so during wwdc.

[-] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Every VR headset needs lenses, and if you have a prescription you get a set for your prescription. If you don’t have a prescription, you get a generic set.

They are magnetic, so sure they can be swapped out. Extra sets for other eyes will cost something.

[-] RustedSwitch@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Sure, what’s the issue here? The article doesn’t say Apple is charging anyone for the appointment. This sounds like a premium experience for prospective customers with $3500 to blow that might not want to figure all of the initial setup stuff out themselves.

They’ll take these opportunities to figure out how to make the self-service as smooth as possible, and start selling without an appointment once that’s been smoothed out.

[-] randombit@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Plus an appointment is not required for those that have an iPhone with LiDAR which is probably nearly everyone who is considering purchasing this.

[-] nodsocket@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I wonder if Apple will set up surgical operation rooms at the Apple Store when the iBrainchip comes out. /s

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If you don't know how a 3500 dollar investment works, then the head scan is just a formality, proving that you have more money than brains.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
94 points (92.0% liked)

Technology

34785 readers
369 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS