258

Summary

Over 100 former presidents of the American Bar Association and other bar associations have issued an open letter condemning recent election lawsuits in swing states, calling them "unsubstantiated" and harmful to democracy.

The letter emphasizes that lawyers are duty-bound to present solid, fact-based cases and warns that baseless lawsuits erode public trust and misuse judicial resources.

The attorneys referenced disbarred lawyers like Rudy Giuliani as cautionary examples and urged legal professionals to uphold ethical standards. This initiative was led by the American Bar Association’s American Democracy Task Force.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AliasAKA@lemmy.world 114 points 2 days ago

If they start disbarring frivolous lawsuit filers that would certainly be a start.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 55 points 2 days ago

For what it’s worth, most of those involved in Trump‘s frivolous 2020 election denial lawsuits have been disbarred.

[-] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev -1 points 2 days ago

My assumption is they get a big enough kick back that it's worth it.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From whom, Trump? The asshole who is infamous for never paying his lawyers?

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Agreed. Won’t happen anytime soon, but agreed.

Seriously it took a criminally long time for Rudy to see this particular, well deserved, consequence to his actions. I think he’s still licensed to practice somewhere, though.

[-] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Seriously it took a criminally long time for Rudy to see this particular, well deserved, consequence to his actions.

Did it though? His actions followed the 2020 election, so they occurred at various times in 2021. Bar discipline isn't occurring while the original cases are pending. Then there is a complaint filed, which has to be investigated, and if they find corroboration, then there needs to be an administrative hearing, akin to a trial.

Please understand that this is a person's livelihood and needs to be carefully considered. He was disbarred in the summer of 2024 in NY. I've had cases, not bar discipline, that take over 5 years to get to trial.

To be clear, I'm absolutely in favor of disbarring shitty attorneys who don't live up to their ethics obligations.

[-] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Also, he was suspended in July 2021, so the consequences were pretty quick, and only the final nail in the coffin was delayed.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Has he seen it yet? He showed up to vote in a car they're trying to sieze.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 24 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t Sidney Powell still have her license? Start there!

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

They tried to disbar her, but in an appeals case, she managed to scrape by with extremely heavy sanctions.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

Wtaf? How? She is a complete kook who will always be associated with “releAsiNg thE kRakEn!” and insane asylum caliber lies about a dead man (Hugo Chavez) controlling US elections.

Her retaining her license is proof positive America is off the rails.

[-] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

In most jurisdictions, it’s nearly impossible to disbar a lawyer, unless they were complicit in the criminal activity of their client. That, alone, is pretty fucked up.

That’s why it took so goddamn long to disbar Rudy Giuliani.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Do they even teach ethics in law schools anymore?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 2 days ago
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Now write a strongly worded letter to the Supreme Court.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

baseless lawsuits erode public trust

Haha that was a good one. As if lawyers had any reputation to lose...

Here's an old joke:

You're in a cage with a wild angry gorilla and a lawyer and you have a revolver with 6 bullets: what do you do?
Shoot the lawyer 6 times and try to reason with the gorilla.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
258 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS