The technology required to travel to another inhabited planet in a different solar system implies so many things. There's no way we'd ever detect them. They wouldn't need to even orbit Earth to do whatever they wanted.
this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
11 points (70.4% liked)
Jingszo !
328 readers
77 users here now
Strange tales ,bizarre stories ,weird publications ,myths ,legends and folklore
Fact or Fiction ? You Decide
Mythology
Archaeology
Paleontology
Cryptozoology
Extraterrestrial Life
UFO's
The Cosmos
History
Paranormal
In fact anything amusing, curious ,interesting, weird ,strange or bizarre
Rules : Be nice and follow the rules
[](https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Given their credentials, I don't doubt what they say. What I doubt is their need to know about need to know classified projects. They've likely seen experimental projects without knowledge of what they were. When I was a kid, before the F117A was announced to the world, we saw them flying over a lake late at night. We were all convinced we had just seen UFOs. But after the jets were announced to the public a few years later, we realized what we had seen. I'm sure there are hundreds of instances like this, especially amongst people close to the military.
Except that some of the objects reported by military personnel defied our current understanding of the laws of physics. Objects being tracked moving in ways that would ensure thousands of Gs, and then turning on a dime. And showing no signs of stress, whereas an F16 starts going through structural failure around 17 Gs.
And this isn't a new thing. Some of the craft moving at insane rates were reported by credible military witnesses back in the 1950s and '60s.
If we're going to trust that the witnesses know what they are talking about (and I we have no reason to not), then we need to also trust that they aren't just being hoodwinked by skunkworks type human/terrestrial vehicles. These guys aren't ignorant, superstitious yokels. They are people of science who have tried to find rational explanations, but none makes sense.
If so they are seeing are cutting-edge human technology then there is a massive disconnect in what DARPA or whoever are coming up with and what is available to the public. Like conventionally hundreds of years of technological progress difference.
How much of that could be explained as an autonomous, or FPV turboshaft quadcopter? Even just electric prop quadcopters are capable of things that would kill a human pilot, and defy our normal perceptions of flight.
Going at speeds that simulate a couple of thousand Gs and then turning on a dime? Going effortlessly from the air into the ocean and then traveling underwater at the speed of a Russian torpedo? And back in the 1980s? C'mon, seriously! No, none of that can be explained by it being a powerful quadcopter.