this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
518 points (99.4% liked)

News

23287 readers
3852 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Vivek Ramaswamy, recently appointed to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has proposed defunding federal programs that lack current congressional authorization.

This could affect programs like veterans’ healthcare, NASA, and early education initiatives, which still receive funding despite expired authorizations.

Ramaswamy argues that cutting these programs could save billions, and he’s committed to targeting expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

DOGE, co-led by Elon Musk, aims to curb government spending, with Musk estimating potential cuts of up to $2 trillion.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FloppyFlounder8@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 11 hours ago

Not for millenia would I have realized that Department of Government Efficiency stood for DoGE. What a funny little boy Elon is.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 125 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

As a US citizen, paying for veterans healthcare and early education programs advance my interests a whole fucking lot more than paying this jackass.

Stupid piece of shit, you don't speak for us.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I know what you mean but he does, quite literally, speak for us now. This is what we asked for.

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (12 children)

I sure as fuck didn't, I voted against every single fascist asshole on my balot. I'm just angry.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 14 points 18 hours ago

So did I but unfortunately we lost. That's democracy in action. The country we live in (the collective we) asked for this.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

Right there with you

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 21 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Okay I agree with the other comments here but I'm a bit confused on this.

How are we still spending money on these things if congress doesn't approve it? The legislature sets the budget, did they just forget to make it official and extend these? Also why even have a phase out period in the first place?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I am terrified at them defunding the VA. I've had a much easier time getting good medical care from VA doctors than I ever did going private and I'd be bankrupt without the VA. It's because of the VA that I have any savings at all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 143 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

As someone with just as much federal authority as the non-existent DOGE, I also propose defunding expenditures that “don’t advance the interests of American citizens.”

And I would like to start with fucking Vivek Ramaswamy and Elon fucking Musk.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 67 points 21 hours ago (10 children)

as equal authority, I propose we just lock them up.

I'm sure we can find something to actually justify it. Like, you know, betraying classified secrets to the russians, as well as providing intelligence and military aid;

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

If we're all just doing things without authority, why does it even need a legalized justification? Home Depot sells dog cages and padlocks.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And now you've circled back to exactly why this Department isn't "non-existent" or "made up" or whatever. "Legal justification" is moot now.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 17 points 16 hours ago

We can't be taking care of Veterans that is way to decent of a thing to do for Republicans.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 52 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

America: Our soldiers are heroes!

Also America: But they don't deserve a penny and should pay exorbitant prices for healthcare...

I know this isn't all Americans, but it's more than I thought.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 59 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Touching NASA very well might be the thing that finally pushes me to actual violence.

Scientific endeavors, but specifically research and exploration of space are pretty much the only things in life I really have a passion for.

[–] can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io 62 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

NASA is definitely a target. Musk wants to make SpaceX America's privatized space agency.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Could you picture that little runt Ramaswami in basic training? He'd wash out on the first day.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm sure this will help with the dramatic drop in people willing to volunteer for the army.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Nice of you to assume you won't get mandatory military service.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Cool. And when EVERYONE is in the military, pissed, and unified with all of the guns and training? Oh, they can ordered, but orders can be ignored when enough people just say…nah, I’m getting fucked so I won’t do it until you do something for me - whatcha gonna do about it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

They stopped drafting people for a reason.

Maybe they forgot? Guess we'll have to remind them.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

90% of folks can't be trained to kill.

Half of the remainder would rather frag their own commanding officers than some poor foreign kid.

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

103% of statistics are made up on the spot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm sure that'll be popular and there won't be any repercussions and that unicorns will poop free candy for everyone.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Doesn't matter. Everyone enjoys their face being eaten. They can blame it on the damn (outgroup) and feel better about themselves. Rage and being better than some other tribe is all that matters anymore.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Sorry, but that unicorn is illegal and should be deported!

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I expected NASA to get screwed by DOGE. What I didn't expect was that it's at the behest of Ramaswamy instead of Elmo. 2024 is defying expectations yet again.

[–] valaramech@fedia.io 12 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

NASA gives SpaceX fat government paychecks. He doesn't want anything to happen to them.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Are you guys for real?? They will literally just cut out the middleman and give all the work to SpaceX instead. Jesus Christ people, read a history book about fascism.

Man, so many people are in for a rude awakening come January, when they realize that their understanding of the previous world order is completely obsolete.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Not necessarily. He wouldn't want anything to happen to the funding that ends up going to himself. He would likely be thrilled if their funding for designing and building their own rockets dried up, though.

It's right in line with the purpose of DOGE and an easy sell to anybody that doesn't immediately see the conflict of interest: "Why are we spending $100 million annually to play catch-up with the private sector? Reallocate $80 million to get rockets that work today and save the taxpayers $20 million while doing it."

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno I disagree. I think he'd like nothing more than if NASA just completely disappeared. I've thought that since the second they started talking about him guiding fiduciary spending. Once NASA is out of the picture, it's all SpaceX all the time. Trump is already most of the way there anyway. "His rocket company is the only reason we can now send American astronauts into space."

This is part of the plan I suspect.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Yep he doesn’t want NASA to steal his thunder with the first manned moon landing since the Apollo program. NASA’s Orion is competing directly with SpaceX

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›