this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
205 points (97.2% liked)

Privacy

32159 readers
619 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am a long term GrapheneOS user and would like to talk about it. r/privacy on the redditland blocks custom OS discussions which I think is very bad for user privacy, and I hope this post will be useful to anyone who are in the hunt for better privacy.

Nowadays smartphones are a much bigger threats to our privacy and Desktop systems, and unfortunately manufacturers has designed them to be locked down devices with no user freedom. You can't just "install Linux" on most smartphones and it is horrible. And most preloaded systems spy on us like crazy. That was why I specifically bought a pixel and loaded GOS onto it.

According to https://grapheneos.org/features , they start from base AOSP's latest version, imptoves upon it's security and significantly hardens it. There's hardened_malloc to.prevent against exploitation, disabling lots of debugging features, disabling USB-c data, hardening the Linux kernel and system apps etc. They even block accessing the hardware identifiers of the phone so that apps cannot detect whqt phone you're using. That means with Tor and zero permissions given, apps are anonymous.

Compatibility with apps are best in Custom ROMs but there are still that can't work, especially if they enforce device integrity. Very few apps usually enforce that tho. Also their community isn't the friendliest but you can get help. Just don't try and engage too much or have too many debates.

Anyone else here use GrapheneOS, or any other privacy ROMs? What is your experience? Do you disagree on any point? Let's have a discussion!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] agile_squirrel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

I've been using it for just over 2 years now and am very happy with it. I am curious about CalyxOS though. While I don't think I'd switch I'd be interested in a technical deep dive comparison between the 2.

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that every Android Lemmy user has a Custom ROM installed on their device. Currently daily driving GrapheneOS on my Pixel 7 Pro.

[–] Der_Fossyler@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

Sending this from Lineage OS 21 ^^

[–] mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not me unfortunately ... I used to have a Samsung Galaxy S9+ with an unofficial port of LineageOS. Nowadays I'm using a Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra with the stock OS.

Maybe a Pixel should be my next phone, so that I get proper support for most custom ROMs.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Pixel 6a with GrapheneOS here. Been using for about a year and a half, and loving it.

[–] dyson@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Exact same setup here! Almost no problems. Also loving it

[–] agile_squirrel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

I don't like the fingerpront sensor. Other than that it works great for me.

[–] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Using it since many years on many Pixels and loving it.

Main pros: zero bloat, efficient, highly secure and highly private (about as private and secure as it can get on any smartphone), and it's an Android without any of Android's typical weaknesses (privacy issues, bloat, etc.). You get to utilize the advantages of Google (its security) and completely avoid the disadvantages (its many privacy issues). You get to use all the advantages of an Android mobile OS while completely avoiding all of its disadvantages. It's like getting your cake and eating it too. You're much better off in terms of security and privacy than almost(?) all other smartphone users. According to leaked documents, Cellebrite for example can't crack GrapheneOS on Pixels at all. They can crack almost any other smartphone if they have physical access to it. Most smartphones are really easy for them to crack. iPhones may pose some trouble depending on model/OS. And Graphene on Pixel is the literal brick wall. And even on top of that it has tons of great security features, like auto-reboot after X hours of inactivity, charge-only-mode for USB-C when locked, distress/duress PIN entry to immediately wipe the phone, many things like that. On the privacy side it's looking great as well: Some folks have analyzed Graphene's network traffic and there's zero privacy issues from the OS or its built-in apps. And the few connections it does make (for updates and so on) are all documented and work exactly like they documented them, and they only transmit the exact least amount of necessary data without anything beyond that (guess what - that's super rare). And on top of that there's even more great privacy features, some of which are invisible but well thought-out, for example any SUPL request goes through a Graphene proxy server first (configurable) which strips all personally-identifiable data from the request and then redirects it to your provider's SUPL server (which is most likely Google's SUPL server in the end). I'm seriously impressed by the quality of the GrapheneOS project. Maybe you don't realize how good and rare such things are nowadays. Also the documentation is very good and actually answers most of your questions and doesn't contain any marketing blurb. The social media feeds and forums are a great source of info as well. On top of all that it's even easy to install GrapheneOS.

Main cons: it's only available on Google Pixel phones, so if you truly despise Google and don't want to buy or use anything from them, it's not the right device/OS for you (or maybe buy it used?). However, the reason GrapheneOS is on Pixel is purely a technical one: Pixels do offer very high hardware based security already (probably the most, although iPhones have good hardware-based security as well. As is known, Apple tends to be produce good quality hardware, not quite so good software) as well as a very high degree of "platform neutrality", i.e. it's supported by Google to flash a different OS on it or use more advanced tools like adb without any sort of tinkering or unnecessary danger involved. Also you don't have to register to unlock your phone or anything, you only need to be online once to enable the OEM unlocking feature (I think this is because Google needs your IMEI to check whether the phone is carrier-locked (cannot ever be OEM unlocked) or can be unlocked, and they will immediately receive some device data including the IMEI as soon as you go online with the preinstalled Android OS once [of course they will receive some more device data than just the IMEI]), so it's best to not insert your SIM yet (and not do anything with the preinstalled OS) before you've installed GrapheneOS on your new Pixel. Do the OEM unlocking step on WiFi only, best on a public WiFi so Google has much less of a chance to identify you based on your IP or related data. Then install Graphene, then insert your SIM and start using your new phone. Other cons exist but they're rare or pretty much irrelevant in daily use. If you have to hear them, read an older post by me about some potential downsides: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/19867254/12069767

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 42 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I post someone's comment on a controversial topic about google and GOS. I saved it because that's exactly how I feel.


Step 1 of installing GrapheneOS for de-googling your life: Buy a Google Pixel phone

Look - I know, I know. I get it. Google allows you to unlock the bootloader while maintaining the phone's unique and excellent hardware security features. The argument makes sense. It is compelling. Other manufacturers do not give you this freedom. I am not arguing about that. I have a Pixel phone running GrapheneOS myself.

However... It is just so very obviously ironic that one needs to trust Google's hardware and purchase a Google product to de-google their life through GrapheneOS. I think that it is a perfectly valid position for someone to raise their eyebrows, laugh, and remain skeptical of the concept either because they do not want to support Google at all, or because they simply will not trust Google's hardware.

The reason why I think that this is "controversial" is because I have seen multiple instances of someone pointing out the irony, followed by someone getting defensive about it and making use of the technical security arguments in an attempt to patch up the irony.

https://mander.xyz/comment/15084264

[–] schmurian@lsmu.schmurian.xyz 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think buying a Pixel phone second hand solves this issue and reduces a little e-waste at the same time.

This. I never buy a Pixel new.

[–] Darth_Vader__@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah it's ironic but what is the alternative? At least we CAN remove Google's known spyware from the device, and there's no evidence of firmware level spying. If you get Samsung, or some chinese crap, you can't remove Google period, and you might get spied by the manufacturer as a cherry on top. There is no way to have a perfect solution, well unless Samsung starts to provide Custom ROM support or something.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 21 points 2 days ago

If your objective is to punish Google, or to have nothing to do with Google. I completely agree with you using a pixel phone just doesn't make any sense. You shouldn't do it

If your objective is to have the most security possible... Then you should install graphene on a Pixel phone.

[–] bruzzard@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

With the lack of any other viable option, I struggle to see the point of the arguement.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

I am. It's good. Don't have any issues just huge compliments to the team.

[–] DollarColonial@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have 1 Pixel 7a running Graphene, 2 Pixel 6a running Graph, 1 Pixel Tablet too, and Pixel 4a using DivestOS.

Top tier.

[–] eleitl@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

How do you like it on the tablet? I've been using CyanogenMod and LineageOS the longest time. Waiting for a Pixel tablet sellout.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

I've been using it on multiple devices for multiple years.

It works for me, and every app in want to use works. I've found that when they don't, it almost always is broken on the stock OS also.

[–] R3D4CT3D@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i really want to make the switch but need to figure out how to steal a pixel phone bc i sure as hell ain’t paying for one

[–] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ive used it for around a year and a half and never had any issues. My banking app stopped working after about 8 months but I just log in via a browser and it hasn't effected my life at all.

For anyone considering the move here is a list of bank apps and their current working status as I know that is a big consideration people worry over.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep. Been using it for about 2 years now. So far no issues except amazon prime but they gave me adds sufficiently annoying that i finally got around to setting up jellyfin. Been able to solve pretty much all my issues with dr gpt.

Every time i see someone posting about a new mobile phone exploit i get immense joy scrolling down through comments and finding someone posting the fact that graphene patched it 3 years ago and recommended a patch to google who have yet to implement it into base android.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

A simple search will tell you a ton of people here use GrapheneOS and other custom ROMs. Are you karma farming?

[–] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago

I have the pleasure of using GrapheneOS. I can't imagine using anything else. It was also the first (widely used) custom Android distribution to adopt Android 15. As far as I can tell, almost no others support Android 15 yet.

[–] Object@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Other than Starbucks app and VoLTE stuff, I haven't encountered an issue yet. Somehow all my banking apps work. The profile feature alone makes it worth it. They also recently increased the number of profiles that can be run in parallel, too.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

I've been on GrapheneOS for 4 years or so. I've tried CalyxOS every now and then, but always end up coming back to GrapheneOS. I find it simple, private, secure and free of BS. CalyxOS does come with some stuff preinstalled, which doesn't really appeal to me, and I trust the sandboxes Google Play model much more that MicroG.

About the devs, I really haven't had any issues that I have not been able to resolve myself, so my interaction with the is non-existing. I have read some posts with interactions with them, and they do seem to be hostile towards anything that is not 100% aligned with their train of thought, which I find stupid, to say the least. But regardless of how rude they may be, I feel GOS literally has no competition in the Android landscape in terms of privacy and security.

[–] theroff@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I use GrapheneOS but I don't like how Google Play-centric it is. It is geared towards people installing their "normal" apps with the GrapheneOS special sauce sandboxing. No F-Droid by default where all of the FOSS apps are.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›