You can move the recovery partition and then expand
Sysadmin
A community dedicated to the profession of IT Systems Administration
No generic Lemmy issue posts please! Posts about Lemmy belong in one of these communities:
!lemmy@lemmy.ml
!lemmyworld@lemmy.world
!lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
!support@lemmy.world
No recovery partition.
Recovery partitions on servers -- especially VMs -- are kind of pointless. Just boot the ISO if you need WinRM.
The recovery partition is used for automatic recovery and sometimes Windows Update. I wouldn't go deleting it willy nilly.
I remember years ago one Windows Update of the vmware drivers that took down all our Windows Servers and they were unable to boot. I thought the recovery partition could be useful for those situations.
Why wouldn't you take a VM snapshot before upgrading?
Because he is not a Chicken?
Grow some hair on your chest
This is a question for my users/admins :-D
Eh, kinda, but a Windows Server ISO would be equally as useful.
A windows server iso would be a lot more useful since you could do anything including reinstall the OS, or copy files from the installer over. Recovery limits you to mostly just what’s already on the C drive.
Well, yes, but I thought that we're all smart enough to know that here and I didn't have to qualify my statement with "In the scenario that the recovery partition would be useful, a Windows ISO would be equally as useful to the task at hand."
Remove the recovery partition, it's pointless anyway.
But what the hell was MS thinking doing that?
Probably along the lines of "Ook ook ook"
deafening type-writer noises
I'm imagining it went something like
"Hey boss, should I set the Server variant to not install the recovery partition?"
"Why?"
"Well, kinda pointless isn't it?"
"Yeah, but like, not hurting anything, and do you want to risk breaking something? Because I don't"
"Yeah, fair point"
As others have said, we remove the recovery partition when it gets in the way.
We came across a very similar but more sticky issue the other day. One of our admins rightfully converted all our VMs from BIOS to UEFI. This, however, created an EFI partition sitting to the right of the OS partition for the majority of our servers. We're now in a position where we can't increase disk size on any of those servers without going through the process of rebooting the box with gparted and manually moving the partition to the left. We're a 24 hour operation with hundreds of servers. This is bad :/
why do you still use BIOS instead of EFI? For any particular reason? VMware recommends EFI for Windows Server 2022. Our Window Server 2022 template is EFI.
Ah, its just legacy servers. Any newer have been built with UEFI for a while now.
You could also push the EFI partition at the very end of the disk whenever you resize the volume. A bit more annoying but can be done live at least. Or at the very least, moving a 500MB partition is a lot faster than moving GBs of C drive, so less time spent on GParted.
Edit vhdx to add more storage, then follow this: https://thedxt.ca/2023/06/moving-windows-recovery-partition-correctly/
Works well