this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
252 points (97.7% liked)

News

23600 readers
3230 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk is unlikely to receive the highest-level government security clearance due to concerns over drug use, foreign contacts, and potential risks of disclosing classified information, according to Wall Street Journal reports.

Musk, who holds “top-secret” clearance, has faced scrutiny for past drug use, including marijuana and alleged ketamine use, and reported contacts with Vladimir Putin since 2022.

SpaceX lawyers advised against seeking higher clearance, fearing denial and revocation of existing clearances.

While Musk may bypass traditional clearance under Trump’s incoming administration, he currently lacks access to SpaceX's most classified projects.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Geobloke@lemm.ee 5 points 1 hour ago

I'm sure he'll just catch up on it on the bathroom

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago

It's a good thing Trump has a history of rigorously protecting classified documents, right guys?

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 55 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

I had a friend, at my first job out of college, have his "sensitive" security clearance denied after a full year of background checks because during his polygraph he admitted to trying cocaine when he was in college. That's the lowest level of security clearance, and yet musk somehow has a clearance near the top.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

How long ago was it? When I did mine, there was an established secondary process if you answered about drugs to explain the circumstances around your usage.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

2005, long before any states had legalized weed or any other recreational drugs.

[–] vikingr@lemmy.world 17 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This happened to me almost 20 years ago. Answered truthfully about smoking weed. Instant denial.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. The spooks are prudes about weed. No wonder we have a lack of talent in classified work.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Seems to me they're just weeding out the folks who can't lie. Can't have any honest ppl in government /s

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

Did your friend have hundreds of billions of dollars?

[–] ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I bet the secret ingredient is money.

[–] ours@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

And the content of their address book.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Is it unlikely or will he not get it?

Anyway, whatever level of security clearance he gets, he'll invariably blab out some secret on Twitter while making one of his "hilarious" jokes during a ketamine binge.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago

Trump already gave military secrets out on twitter during his last presidency

It’s not as low of a bar as you think

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If I am not mistaken, the President has a lot of authority over security clearances. So for the next 4 years, just like with many other things, it will depend on how a certain Orange feels that day.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 88 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

I hope he pisses off trump enough to get destroyed.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

It's inevitable.
They're both extreme narcissists and only Trump has any legitimate power out of the two. Eventually musk will try too hard to control him and Trump will use everything in his power to destroy him which, thanks to the Supreme Court, is now unlimited.
So I'd expect to see the IRS weaponized against Musk sometime in the next 12 months at the absolute latest.

[–] Mobiuthuselah@lemm.ee 49 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

If enough people start talking about President Musk and his sidekick Trump...

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

This has to spread enough for orange turd to watch !

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Hopefully they destroy each other while they’re at it

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 55 points 16 hours ago (6 children)

Musk, who holds “top-secret” clearance, has faced scrutiny for past drug use, including marijuana and alleged ketamine use, and reported contacts with Vladimir Putin since 2022.

That escalated quickly.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago

Remember kids, Putin: not even once.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago

I would bet his ketamine use predated the time he famously smoked weed on Rogan's show.

And he does not strike me as a regular consumer of cannabis.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 33 points 15 hours ago

Marijuanas is a gateway drug. I smoked 3 marijuanas and 5 weeks later came out of my k hole and I was in the middle of multi-billion dollar business deal with Kim Jong Un. Never smoking marijuanas again.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's the logical progression from smoking a marijuana, it's not worth doing it.

[–] tiptaptoe@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's correct, been smoking for a few years now and didn't meed Putin until last month.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Remember the classical progression: Marijuana, then ketamine, then Putin.

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I quickly went from thinking “yeah i can’t blame him those sound like the usual reasons why no one wants to work for the feds” to “oh”

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

One of those is not like the others

[–] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 28 points 15 hours ago

He shouldn’t have any clearance

[–] tiptaptoe@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting that he doesnt have access to his own company's project

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Not that he should, but I would bet that's less unusual than you would think. I imagine a lot of defence contractor CEOs are not given the clearance to access certain pieces of information that those working on the project have because some things need to be kept need-to-know.