1
21
2
30

King Charles and Prince William are secretly raking in millions of pounds from cash-strapped government departments, schools, the armed forces and even the NHS, a new investigation claims.

The latest Channel 4 Dispatches inquiry asserts that while the monarch and heir to the throne’s respective private estates – the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, which generate £50 million a year – are not funded by the taxpayer, each receives ‘extensive’ amounts of money from public services.

Documents made public for the first time allegedly show how the Duchy of Lancaster is banking £11.4 million as part of a deal with Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust to house its new fleet of electric ambulances.

It also claims the Duchy of Cornwall has signed a £37 million deal to lease the currently inactive Dartmoor Prison to the Ministry of Justice, charged the navy more than £1 million to build and use jetties and moor warships, and stands to earn nearly £600,000 from rental agreements with state schools over the lifetime of six different leases.

The Duchy of Lancaster is a portfolio of land, property and assets across England and Wales held in trust for the Sovereign, including key urban developments, historic buildings, high-quality farm land and areas of great natural beauty, dating back to the 14th century.

The Duchy of Cornwall is a similar portfolio valued at more than £1 billion which provides an income for the heir to the throne.

Both estates are exempt from paying Corporation Tax or Capital Gains Tax.

Author and royal land expert Guy Shrubsole tells the documentary: ‘[It] strikes me as very odd, that ultimately, we, the taxpayer, are paying for the NHS to have a lease or a warehouse or whatever from the Duchy of Lancaster.

‘I think this asks quite searching questions about quite how they are making their profits. Why are there not peppercorn rents or social rents being charged for the NHS, for example?’

The King, The Prince & Their Secret Millions: Dispatches airs tonight at 8.10pm on Channel 4.

King and Prince of Wales ‘take money from charities they champion’

The investigation accuses the King and his heir of making money from the good causes they promote.

It alleges the Duchy of Cornwall has pocketed at least £22 million since 2005 from a share of the rents paid on Camelford House, which sits on the banks of the Thames.

The building is nicknamed ‘charity towers’ due to the number it houses.

But two cancer charities boasting the King as a long-term patron – Marie Curie and Macmillan – have both recently downsized, with the latter saying it wanted to free up funds.

Charles became patron of St John’s Ambulance last year, which the doc claims previously paid the Duchy of Cornwall almost £60,000 for use of its land.

The King is also patron of the RNLI and William and Kate are supporters – but the Duchy of Cornwall still charges it small amounts to use slipways in various corners of the South West.

Baroness Margaret Hodge, a former Labour MP and chair of the public accounts committee, told the programme: ‘In the court of public opinion, you always have to be cleaner than clean.

‘And if there is a question mark over a charity that has a royal patronage and therefore gains extra income, then that income is then used pay rent back to the royals, it just doesn’t feel quite right.’

Royal environment ‘hypocrites’

Both the King and Prince William have warned about our responsibility to protect the environment.

Charles has said: ‘Unless we rapidly repair and restore nature’s unique economy based on harmony and balance, which is our ultimate sustainer, our own economy and survivability will be imperilled.’

And William has added: ‘The shared goals for our generation are clear, together we must protect and restore nature, clean our air, revive our oceans, build a waste free world and fix our climate.’

But Dispatches says it has unearthed investments by their estates which threaten the same natural world they insist we desperately need to protect.

Collectively, the Duchies own thousands of mineral rights – and have cashed in by striking deals with controversial mining companies for sites across the country.

In Hingston Down, an area of outstanding natural beauty, the Duchy of Cornwall leases land to one of the biggest polluters in Europe.

Royals’ tenants ‘left shivering in cold and mouldy homes’

Working with the Mirror newspaper, the programme found that scores of properties being rented out by both Duchies failed to comply with minimum energy efficient requirements for landlords – leaving some tenants shivering in homes blighted by black mould and struggling with fuel poverty.

It found 14% of homes leased by the Duchy of Cornwall and 13% by the Duchy of Lancaster have an energy performance rating of F or G.

Since 2020, it has been against the law for landlords to rent out properties that are rated below an E under the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards regulations.

Many failing properties emit huge amounts of carbon, which again impacts the environment.

One tenant said: ‘It gets miserably cold in winter. I can only heat two rooms in my home. The Duchy does not understand.’

A second added: ‘The house is cold, and it is a struggle but there is nowhere else to live here. They are not good landlords. When the wind blows the curtains start swinging. There’s no heating upstairs at all.’

‘Time for change’

Mr Shrubsole said: ‘I think the light you’re shedding on the goings on within the Duchies of Cornwall or Lancaster is crucial to generating more public debate.

‘I think it’s past time for the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster to ultimately be dissolved and folded into the Crown Estate. They have to give their profits to the Exchequer. And then some of that comes back to us, the taxpayer.

‘This isn’t about whether you think there should be a monarch or not. It’s simply about good management.’

Baroness Hodge said: ‘This would be a brilliant time for the monarch to say, I’m going to be open, and I want to be treated as fairly as anybody.

‘It’s public money, it’s taxpayer’s money – your money, it’s my money, it’s the viewers’ money.’

Charles’s annual income from the Duchy of Lancaster rose by 5% to £27.4 million in 2023/24, according to accounts published by the estate in July.

William received an annual private income of more than £23.6 million from the Duchy of Cornwall last year, accounts showed.

The income from both the duchies is separate from the taxpayer-funded Sovereign Grant which pays for the monarch’s official duties.

Neither the King nor the Prince of Wales are legally obliged to pay income tax but both have offered to do so.

A spokesperson for the Duchy of Lancaster said: ‘The Duchy of Lancaster operates as a commercial company, managing a broad range of land and property assets across England and Wales.

‘It complies with all relevant UK legislation and regulatory standards applicable to its range of business activities.

‘The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster is responsible to the Sovereign for the administration of the Duchy. However, he/she delegates certain functions, particularly those regarding asset management, to the Duchy Council.

‘While His Majesty The King takes a close interest in the work of the Duchy, the day-to-day management of the portfolio is the responsibility of the Council and executive team.

‘The Duchy has made a number of key environmental improvements in recent years, delivering a significant increase in the number of A+, A and B EPC ratings awarded to our properties as a result of refurbishment or restoration works.

‘Currently, over 87% of all Duchy let properties are rated E or above. The remainder are either awaiting scheduled improvement works or are exempted under UK legislation.

‘The financial and environmental performance of the Duchy is disclosed each year in our published Report and Accounts which are independently audited and freely available on the Duchy of Lancaster website.

‘His Majesty The King voluntarily pays tax on all income received from the Duchy, as did the late Queen Elizabeth II.’

A Duchy of Cornwall spokesperson said: ‘The Duchy of Cornwall is a private estate with a commercial imperative which we achieve alongside our commitment to restoring the natural environment and generating positive social impact for our communities.

‘Prince William became Duke of Cornwall in September 2022 and since then has committed to an expansive transformation of the Duchy.

‘This includes a significant investment to make the estate net zero by the end of 2032, as well as establishing targeted mental health support for our tenants and working with local partners to help tackle homelessness in Cornwall.’

The spokesperson added: ‘The Duchy is engaging with the critical minerals industry in Cornwall to respond to the UK Government’s Industrial Strategy.

‘We have granted a number of three-year exploration licences, and all licensees must ensure that their activities are in strict accordance with statutory requirements and meet high environmental standards.’

Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

3
26
4
9
5
40

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22046046

cross-posted from: https://hcommons.social/users/adachika192/statuses/113409952846501174

More than 100 BBC staff accuse broadcaster of Israel bias in Gaza coverage (Independent, 2024-11-01)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/bbc-israel-gaza-letter-tim-davie-bias-palestine-b2636737.html
———

(Link to the “Letter for Gaza”
https://substack.com/inbox/post/151024243?utm%5C_campaign=post&showWelcomeOnShare=true )

“More than 100 BBC employees are accusing the corporation of providing favourable coverage toward Israel and are calling on the broadcaster to ‘recommit to fairness, accuracy, and impartiality’ over its reporting on Gaza.

“In a letter sent to Tim Davie, signed by more than 230 members of the media industry, including 101 anonymous BBC staff, the corporation is criticised for failing its own editorial standards by lacking ‘consistently fair and accurate evidence-based journalism in its coverage of Gaza’”.

#BBC #OpenLetter #FairJournalism
@palestine@lemmy.ml
@palestine@a.gup.pe
@israel

6
16

Joint Statement from left leaning politicians criticising the new Budget.

Labour’s first budget punishes the “working people” they claim to support. Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves promised to deliver real change to the electorate, after 14 years of Tory rule. This week, they have broken that promise. This budget is austerity by another name.

While we welcome the government’s decision to invest in school and hospital buildings, it is extremely disappointing that these investments have been undermined by a swathe of public sector cuts, cruel attacks on the worst off, and a dogmatic refusal to redistribute wealth and power. These are not “tough choices” for government ministers, but for ordinary people who are forced to choose between heating their home and putting food on the table.

Labour is raising defence expenditure to 2.5% of GDP while telling us there is no money to lift 250,000 children out of poverty. This is a lie. There is plenty of money – it’s just in the wrong hands. The richest 1% in the UK hold more wealth than 70% of Britons. By refusing to impose a wealth tax, this government has chosen to force vulnerable communities to pay the price for years of economic failure, instead of making the richest pay their fair share. Labour’s first budget shows us whose side they’re on.

Years of austerity and privatisation have decimated our public services and pushed millions into poverty, disproportionately impacting women, people of colour and disabled people. Making millions of children, working, retired and disabled people poorer damages our entire economy and stretches our public services. An austerity economy is a false economy.

We, along with nearly 100 progressive Independent and Green politicians across the country, are calling on the Labour government to: 1) introduce wealth taxes; 2) abolish the two-child benefit cap and stop attacking welfare recipients; 3) reverse cuts to winter fuel; 4) restore the £2 bus cap; and 5) invest in a Green New Deal.

We refuse to believe that child poverty, mass hunger and homelessness are inevitable in the sixth largest economy in the world. A progressive movement is growing up and down the country, demanding a real alternative to this race to the bottom between Labour and the Tories, which has seen the new government perpetuate decades of austerity and rampant corporate greed.

The Tories’ collapse allowed Labour to come to power with the lowest vote share ever won by any single-party majority government. Labour haemorrhaging votes to progressive independents and Greens in their heartlands should be a lesson to this government: you are wrong to believe that progressive voters have nowhere else to go. Our movement is growing every day – and you ignore the demand for a real alternative at your peril.

-- Jeremy Corbyn MP Independent, Carla Denyer MP Green party co-leader, Adrian Ramsay MP Green party co-leader, Sian Berry MP Green party, Ben Lake MP Plaid Cymru, Ann Davies MP Plaid Cymru, Liz Saville Roberts MP Plaid Cymru, Llinos Medi MP Plaid Cymru, Zack Polanski Green party deputy leader and London assembly member, Leanne Mohamad Independent candidate for Ilford North, Jamie Driscoll Former North of Tyne mayor, Andrew Feinstein Former ANC MP and Independent candidate for Holborn and St Pancras, Leanne Wood Former leader, Plaid Cymru, Beth Winter Former Labour MP for Cynon Valley, Hilary Schan Chair, We Deserve Better and Independent councillor in Worthing, Anthony Slaughter Wales Green party leader

7
15

The seven shipments of F-35 parts from RAF Marham took place on 11 November 2023, 13 January, 21 January, 7 February, 28 April, 28 July, and 6 August 2024.

In six of those cases, the registered sender was the Lockheed Martin UK Integrated Systems office which is based in Havant, a town near Portsmouth.

An MoD spokesperson said: “In keeping with the government’s announcement on arms exports in September, there have been no exports of F-35 parts direct to Israel via RAF Marham since that licencing suspension.

“UK components for the multinational F-35 programme are excluded from that decision, except where going directly to Israel”.

8
202
9
5
10
12
11
58
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Nick Timothy, a Conservative MP, asked Lammy to clarify that "there is not a genocide occurring in the Middle East", adding that words like "genocide" in connection with Gaza were "not appropriate" and "repeated by protesters and lawbreakers".

Lammy’s answer began well: "These are, quite properly, legal terms that must be determined by international courts."

Lammy might have noted that experts, such as the Israeli scholar Omer Bartov and the Lemkin Institute, founded by Raphael Lemkin, who in 1942 invented the term genocide, have already described Israel’s action in Gaza as exactly that. Neither can remotely be described as protesters or lawbreakers.

Instead, Lammy got chummy with Timothy. This should not come as a surprise since Keir Starmer's Labour has a habit of siding with Tories rather than its own MPs over Gaza.

"I do agree with the honourable gentleman," said Lammy, before redefining the term genocide in a way that no expert would recognise, let alone accept. The word, the foreign secretary told the House of Commons, was "largely used when millions of people lost their lives in crises like Rwanda, the Second World War, the Holocaust, and the way that they are used now undermines the seriousness of that term".

12
12
13
36
14
14
Budget 2024 Thread (www.youtube.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by sirico@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Live feed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oT8JZ6Ln5ls

Taken from the Guardian:

Reeves’s opening remarks

Rachel Reeves says the UK voted for change, and the Labour government has a mandate for a decade of “national renewal”.

Reeves pledges “more pounds in people’s pockets” and improved living standards. The only way to drive economic growth is to “invest, invest, invest”, she says.

The government must “restore economic stability and turn the page on 14 years” of Conservative government, Reeves says. The Labour party has rebuilt the UK economy before, and will “rebuild Britain once again”.

Reeves says this budget will raise taxes by £40bn.

She adds that she is “deeply proud to be Britain’s first ever female chancellor of the exchequer’.

Peter Walker, senior political correspondent: Reeves sets out the political challenge – and the very big one – at the centre of her budget, and indeed the whole government: making people feel they are better off, and with better public services. And this requires investment, she says, adding some inevitable Tory-bashing for good measure, plus noting her status as the first-ever female chancellor. National insurance

Employees will not pay more directly, Reeves says, but she will raise employers’ national insurance contributions by 1.2 percentage points to 15% from April.

The government will also reduce a secondary threshold when contributions are due from £9,100 to £5,000.

Those measures will raise £25bn a year by the end of the forecast period.

Before the budget, employers were liable for a rate of 13.8% of workers’ earnings above £175 a week. An increase of one percentage point would raise an estimated £8.5bn.

PW: This is the big fiscal hitter of the budget – £25bn a year by the end of the parliament – and probably the most politically perilous choice Reeves will make. There is no doubt that public services need the extra money, and voters want better public services. But it will be portrayed as tax on jobs, and as something that could hit growth, even with the new allowances for smaller businesses. Income tax

Reeves says the government will increase personal tax thresholds on income tax and national insurance in line with inflation from 2028-29.

PW: If not a fully fledged rabbit yanked from a hat, then we do perhaps have a glimpse of a nose and some whiskers. The surprise move allows Reeves to argue she has kept Labour’s manifesto promise to not increase taxes on working people – even if it does only start in 2028/29. Capital gains and inheritance tax

Capital gains tax will be increased. The lower rate will be raised from 10% to 18%, while the higher rate will rise from 20% to 24%. However, there will be no increase on the 24% capital gains rate imposed on second properties.

The government will extend a freeze on the threshold for inheritance tax, allowing £325,000 to be inherited tax free.

There will be tax raises worth £2bn from reforming reliefs for business and agricultural assets. After £1m, those assets will attract inheritance tax of 20%.

PW: A rise in capital gains tax was very much baked in with budget expectations, and the increases are not huge – as Reeves says, they will keep UK rates relatively low by international standards. And it will raise a relatively modest £2.5bn by the end of the parliament. On inheritance tax, she has largely closed loopholes connected to farms, but even this and other tweaks will raise an eventual £2bn a year. None of this is likely to be hugely contentious. The minimum wage

Reeves confirms that the “national living wage”, the legal minimum for over-21s, will increase by 6.7% to £12.21, equivalent to £1,400 a year for an eligible full-time worker.

There will be a single adult rate phased in over time to eventually equalise pay for under-21s.

PW: The most recent of dozens of announcements to be briefed in advance of the budget. Paying people more is usually seen as a vote-winner – but ministers will also be wary of business voices warning about the impact this could have on job creation. Tobacco and alcohol

The government will implement a levy on vapes, which will be increased in line with tobacco.

Tobacco taxes will rise by 2% above retail prices index (RPI) measure of inflation for the rest of this parliament, and tax on hand-rolling tobacco will increase by 10%.

Taxes on alcohol will rise in line with the RPI. However, Reeves announces a cut in draught duty by 1.7%, which she says is a penny off a pint in the pub.

PW: On what we are obliged to call sin taxes, Reeves has, as expected, further taxed tobacco and vapes. In another sign of how this government is less worried about what might be termed nanny state measures, it is also toughening the levy on sugary soft drinks. As a sop to the tabloids, she did cut 1p off the duty of a pint of draught beer. Fuel duty

Reeves says increasing fuel duty next year would be the “wrong choice”, so she extends the freeze for a year and maintains the last government’s 5p cut.

Fuel duty was frozen between 2011 and 2022, and cut by 5p in March 2022 after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

PW: A continued freeze to fuel duty was one of the most politically tricky decisions faced by Reeves. On the one hand, as she said, the £3bn cost is a lot. But the anti-fuel duty rise lobby is very powerful, and increasing it could (and would) be portrayed as a tax rise for working people. Private school fees

VAT will be brought in on private school fees in January 2025.

PW: Not in the least a surprise, and if you believe the polling, one of the more popular policies in both the Labour manifesto and in this budget. Will it see a rush of private school students into the state sector? Time will tell, but ministers are fairly relaxed. Schools and education

Reeves says the Department for Education will receive £6.7bn, a 19% real-terms increase. That includes £1.4bn to rebuild schools in the greatest need.

The schools budget will increase by £2.3bn to support the hiring of teachers.

There will be £2.1bn for school maintenance, a £300m increase.

Reeves announces a £1bn uplift in funding for special needs.

There will be another £300m for higher education.

PW: One of the most visible and enduring legacies of the last Labour government was the many new and renovated schools it delivered. Reeves has set out her ambition to copy this – the 19% real-terms increase in investment is an instant lesson on what you can do with the changed fiscal rules. NHS

Reeves promises a 10-year plan for the NHS in the spring, targeting 2% productivity growth next year.

She announces a £22.6bn increase in the day-to-day health budget, and £3.1bn increase in the capital budget. That includes £1bn for repairs and upgrades and £1.5bn for new beds in hospitals and testing capacity.

PW: At risk of endlessly repeating a theme, the state of the NHS is one of the biggest factors on which Labour won the election, and on which it will be judged five years later. Will a £22.6bn increase in everyday spending be enough? Not without parallel structural changes. But it’s fair to say that without it, waiting lists would surely rise again. And the voters would notice. Housing

The government will spend £5bn on housing, including increasing the supply of affordable housing.

The government will reduce right-to-buy discounts, and local governments will retain the earnings from council housing sales to allow them to reinvest.

The government will hire “hundreds of new planning officers” to accelerate housebuilding.

PW: All the figures and new policies on housing were briefed in advance, and for good political reason. One of the key metrics the Starmer government has set itself is to build 1.5m new homes – and the voters are watching. Transport

Reeves commits to the Transpennine Route Upgrade, improving capacity at Manchester Victoria, and electrifying the Wigan to Bolton route. She also promises to support east-west rail link between Oxford and Cambridge.

Reeves confirms the government will fund tunnelling of HS2 to London Euston.

There will be a £500m increase in the roads budget next year to target potholes.

PW: No, it’s not full HS2, but the ragbag of mainly northern rail routes, and confirmation that the Manchester-London route will end in Euston are something. And as every councillor will tell you, at length, voters are very, very interested in potholes. Energy

Reeves announces £3.4bn for the warm homes plan to upgrade buildings, lowering energy bills.

The government will fund Great British Energy, a new body to be based in Aberdeen.

Public spending

There will be a 1.5% increase in real spending on government departments, and 1.7% when including capital spending.

Defence

Reeves announces a £2.9bn increase in military spending next year, as well as funding for second world war commemorations next year.

Local government

There will be £1.3bn for additional grant funding for local government, including £600m for social care.

Greater Manchester and the West Midlands will get integrated settlements next year, allowing them to take more control of their spending.

PW: This is something for a part of public life which bore the brunt of austerity, and the section often most keenly felt by voters. Is it enough? Of course not. But is it a start? Yes. Public investment

Reeves says more public investment is needed in the UK. A new rule will target debt falling as a share of the economy. She confirms that debt will be measured as public sector net financial liabilities, recognising benefits from investments.

The rule will apply in 2029-30, and then net financial debt will fall by the third year of every forecast.

There will be regular reports on government investments from the OBR.

She says the government will invest £1bn in aerospace, £2bn in automotive to support electric vehicles, and £500m for life sciences.

Reeves adds the government will invest £6.1bn in funding in sectors such as engineering, biotechnology and medical science.

PW: Politically, albeit most likely in the longer term, this could be the most significant change in the budget. To very obviously make the link between low investment and the state of public services, Reeves lists the problems of crumbling infrastructure in various sectors to a series of cries of “Shame!” from Labour MPs. Planes and private jets

Air passenger duty will increase by up to £2 for each economy short-haul flight, Reeves says.

Private jets will attract an extra 50% air passenger duty, up to £450 per passenger for a flight.

PW: This is both a largely politically-risk free change, and one which allowed the chancellor to make a few well-aimed jokes in the direction of Rishi Sunak, saying the levy would be applied on flights going to “say … California?”. It wins plenty of laughs. Business taxes and non-doms

The government will introduce permanently lower business rates for retail, hospitality and leisure businesses from 2026-27. Until then they will receive 40% relief on business rates up to a cap of £110,000.

Employment allowance will be increased from £5000 to £10,500, reducing national insurance for smaller businesses.

Taxes on carried interest, generally paid by private equity managers, will rise from 28% to 32% from April.

Reeves confirms the oil profits levy will be increased to 38%, and extended.

The concept of non-domicile residents will be abolished from April.

Compensation schemes

Reeves says the government will compensate victims of the infected blood scandal with £11.8bn, and there will be another £1.8bn for victims of the Post Office Horizon IT scandal.

PW: Even Tory MPs will find it hard to argue with this. And Reeves’s words that the last government apologised for the infected blood scandal but failed to budget at all for compensation payments is a powerful argument. Other measures

Reeves says the government will raise £6.5bn through targeting tax avoidance, including by umbrella companies.

OBR

Reeves says Labour inherited a £22bn “black hole” with allegedly unfunded pledges by the Conservative government.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the government’s budget watchdog, has published a review saying that the previous government did not disclose details of spending. Those details would have made forecasts “materially different”, Reeves says.

Reeves says the government will implement 10 recommendations from the OBR’s review.

PW: This is very nakedly partisan and in some ways familiar, not least the idea of the £22bn fiscal black hole. But the idea of the OBR saying it was effectively misled by the Conservatives is very strong political cover for the coming tax rises in limited increases to public budgets. It will enrage Jeremy Hunt, the shadow chancellor, all the more. Inflation and growth forecasts

The chancellor will maintain the Bank of England’s 2% target for inflation.

Inflation will average 2.5% in 2024, rising to 2.6% in 2025, before gradually dropping to 2% in 2029, according to OBR forecasts. Inflation was at 1.7% in September, below the Bank of England’s 2% target, and down from 11% in October 2022.

The OBR slightly upgrades its growth forecast for this year, but adjusts them down in later years. GDP growth is forecast to be 1.1% in 2024, then 2%, 1.8%, 1.5%, 1.5%, and 1.6% in 2030, Reeves says. At the spring budget under the then Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt the OBR had forecast 0.8% growth this year, 1.9% in 2025, and 2% in 2026.

PW: The OBR’s inflation and growth predictions are hardly stellar, with inflation not due to fall down to the 2% target before 2029. But in truth, as long as it stays in the 2% range, Reeves would take it. She will, however, very much hope that the growth figures – the stated central task of the Keir Starmer government – pick up. Government borrowing

Reeves announces new rules to not borrow for day-to-day spending. The current budget will be balanced within three years of forecasts.

The government will run a deficit of £26.2bn in 2026, but will achieve a surplus of £10.9bn in 2027-28, £9.3bn in 2028-29 and £9.9bn in 2029-30.

Public sector net debt will fall from £127bn in 2024-25, falling gradually to £70.6bn by 2029-20.

PW: Expect the forecasts of reduced borrowing and an eventual surplus to be much mentioned by ministers in the coming days and weeks, as they try to push back against the Conservatives’ charges of fiscal incompetence. The tougher rules on day-to-day spending will be seen as a balance to the relaxation of their equivalent on investment, as already announced. Closing remarks

Reeves says it is a moment of “fundamental choice” for the UK.

She says the government will protect the NHS, protect working people and “rebuild Britain”.

She says the Conservatives must say what choices they would make if they disagree with her decisions. They would have to cut schools and hospitals if they disagree with any tax increases.

PW: Reeves’s final words are an open challenge to the Conservatives – and an attempt to pre-empt their accusations of broken promises: ‘what would you do instead?” It is a fair question, even if as an opposition you sometimes get a free pass on such scrutiny.

15
13
16
4
17
44
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Mike Amesbury MP has been suspended from the Labour Party after CCTV footage emerged which appears to show he punched one of his constituents in the face before attacking the victim while he was on the floor.

The footage, obtained by MailOnline, shows Mr Amesbury squaring up to one of his constituents at 2.15am on Saturday in his constituency of Runcorn and Helsby, Cheshire.

He proceeds to punch the victim in the face, who then falls into the road. The Labour MP then punches the victim at least six times more while he is on the ground.

The Labour politician, who has now lost the whip, has claimed he “felt threatened” in the run-up to the exchange and was later filmed telling the victim never to threaten him again as others attended to the injured man.

...

A Labour Party spokesperson said: “Mike Amesbury MP has been assisting Cheshire Police with their inquiries following an incident on Friday night. As these inquiries are now ongoing, the Labour Party has administratively suspended Mr Amesbury’s membership of the Labour Party pending an investigation.’’

Previously:

edit: Video footage seems to be exclusive to the Daily Mail.

18
26
19
18
submitted 1 week ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

A video has emerged appearing to show MP Mike Amesbury shouting and swearing at a man who is lying on the pavement during an apparent disturbance in Cheshire.

The Labour member for Runcorn and Helsby is seen pointing to the man and saying “you won’t threaten the MP ever again, will you?” in the early hours of Saturday in Frodsham town centre.

It is not clear from the footage, which was apparently filmed by an onlooker, what happened in the moments beforehand.

A Cheshire Police spokeswoman said officers were called to reports of an assault and were examining the circumstances.

...

Posting on his own Facebook page, the 55-year-old backbencher said: "Last night I was involved in an incident that took place after I felt threatened following an evening out with friends.

"This morning I contacted Cheshire Police myself to report what happened.

20
26

His list of proposals include:

  • Action to stop e-bikes and scooters being ridden on pavements
  • An end to 'street scars', where gaps in street paving are replaced with tarmac
  • A "galvanising" national goal to reduce the amount of litter
  • Councils to sort dumping of fridges, mattresses and broken cars
  • Action to stop phone boxes and street furniture being covered in graffiti

What a bastard /s.

21
44
22
108

Oh no.

23
143
submitted 1 week ago by Five@slrpnk.net to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
24
11
25
14
view more: next ›

UK Politics

3065 readers
136 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS