this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
496 points (99.6% liked)

Open Source

31679 readers
467 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except this isn't money going to a FOSS project, it's money to some guys whose only keyboard is StackOverflow's The Key.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If its forked from a Foss project then its necessarily a Foss project. That's why we use Foss licenses.

[–] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Vscode is released under a MIT license and the Continue extension is released under Apache. Neither is copyleft, so the forked codebase doesn't need to be open source

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 2 months ago

Ah you're right. Blame Vscode for using MIT. Maybe now is a good time to tell them to change it to GPL, so this can't happen again.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Right, exactly, which is why they launched with a FOSS license. Oh, wait--

Imagine the money going to VSCode which actually is the one getting contributions

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're upset, just ask them for the source. If they don't respond, sue.

In any case, we're all going to get the source and we'll all benefit from this.

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The source is literally just VSCode with a different label. What benefit does that have?