this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
140 points (83.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44149 readers
1272 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious because I donโ€™t see people talk about it a lot.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 50 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Ads, ads everywhere.

Besides there, there is also a 4k OTA standard, ATSC 3.0. Most TVs don't support it yet, but some do. Worth googling before you buy. You can also get something like an silcondust 4k standalone tuner and plug that into your home network instead. You then load its app to watch over the air TV in 4k.

If you do buy the silicondust tuner, you can go further and get a DVR going. Plenty of free projects that will help you setup and record TV like jellyfin, and many of them will auto-skip the ads too with an application called comskip.

[โ€“] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Atsc 3.0 requires an internet connection for it's bullshit DRM

[โ€“] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Woww, over the air broadcasts with copy protection? ๐Ÿคฎ

It's like they want OTA TV to die off.

[โ€“] Kushan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That seems entirely pointless then, why not just stream the content.

[โ€“] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Bandwidth is cheaper from the tower since the signal is the "same" for each client and it can then be distributed over a wide area. You send the "DRM" (Just a fancy encryption key) over the network since it's relatively small and likely unique to each device (probably fingerprinting the device ids to the content invisibily in case of piracy).

[โ€“] Kushan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Multicast is a thing, though it doesn't seem to be widespread. That would make a lot more sense than this weird DRM broadcast system.

[โ€“] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Multicast still requires more expensive less widespread bandwidth than sending out analog signals ota & shooting off a few packets of encryption information every now and then. US infrastructure has rapidly improved over the past few years, but we're still a farcry from anything robust and reliable enough to serve the people benefiting from this type of content.

[โ€“] Fermion@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Having the receiver phone home would have the benefit of generating more accurate viewership data, where broadcast tv has historically relied on representative cohorts.

[โ€“] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

No OTA broadcasts in the US utilize 4k yet. ATSC 3.0 is being utilized some, but not exclusively, but no one is broadcasting 4k unfortunately