this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
957 points (95.9% liked)

memes

10327 readers
2155 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I cannot trust "furscience" to be impartial.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They have verifiable sources and are an international group of interdisciplinary scientists but their conclusions don't mean that your subjective experiences aren't real. Still, they are anecdotal, which is why I wanted to provide another source of information for people reading this thread.

EDIT: To clarify, Furscience is a research group funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. They are actual, published scientists, some with doctorates. Even if some of them are part of the subculture they still apply proper methodology and are subject to peer review.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Fair enough. You're right on that front.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

god forbid i trust climate scientists to tell me whether climate change is happening.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Climate science doesn't come from a single source. I don't see this furry science being referenced outside of furry science.

[–] kshade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don’t see this furry science being referenced outside of furry science.

I don't quite understand what you mean by that but their publications have been cited by people who aren't part of the research group. Which is an actual academic endeavor with many contributors, not just someone blogging.

god forbid a chemistry major doesn't peer review my sociological paper written on the furry community.

TBF a sociologist might, but furscience are likely sociologists anyway so.

[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

"I cannot trust “furscience” to be impartial." I love this quote.