memes

10666 readers

1819 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civil

No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politics

This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent reposts

Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No bots

No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads

No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

!tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
!linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
!comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world

The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website

958

I... don't know how to feel about this (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No see again, where porn is acceptable is at someone’s house, not in public. The people on the train do not need to see you watching porn whether you’re cranking it or not, and whether it’s furry porn or not.

nobody is arguing for this? Public obscenity laws exist for a reason.

are you comparing fur suits to literal porn? If so, then i may argue we ban all public display of sports attire because i find it distinctly related to sex.

If you see a furry in a mcdonalds, they're probably buying food because their hungry lmao. It's not like it's some weird BDSM psyop.

Interesting to note about the possible overlap or lack thereof, and possible correlation but not causation, thanks for your insight on that!

that's what im here for, np

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I am relating fursuits to BDSM leather, gimp suits, pup play gear, latex, etc, yes. Sports attire clearly doesn't fit this category, save maybe the cheerleaders of course I suppose. I was talking about fursuits in public from the get go, in the quote you quoted me in fact. You brought up porn, that's why I responded about porn in public. Seems maybe you're one of those people who don't bother reading what they're responding to?

How eat with suit on? Why not just not wear the suit in public? At least the gimp while being similarly inappropriate in public despite your protests can unzip the mouth, that just seems like added difficulty to me.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Fursuits are not revealing or sexy and the people in them are not putting them on only in cases they want to have sex. It's not connected like that.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

that's like relating halloween costumes to BDSM gear. Or like i said, sports jerseys.

That was literally the point lmao.

You brought up porn

yes. for an irrelevant reason

that’s why I responded about porn in public.

fursuits are not porn, public indecency is not porn, and fursuits are not public indecency.

How eat with suit on?

take off the head.

Why not just not wear the suit in public?

they don't? Like most of the time? Whenever you see a furry in public chances are, there's a fur con, if not, they're probably not causing problems.

At least the gimp while being similarly inappropriate in public despite your protests can unzip the mouth, that just seems like added difficulty to me.

you have to be trolling