Technology

60041 readers

2028 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

611

Is it just me or do all search engines feel soooo bad these days? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MTK@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

239 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don't like the idea of AI giving me "facts" since they are mostly based on other AI posts

ETA: someone suggested SearXNG and after using it a bit it seems to be much better compared to ddg and the rest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't honestly even remember the last time I've googled something. Nowdays I'll just ask chatGPT

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The problem with getting answers from AI is that if they don't know something, they'll just make it up.

[–] OlinOfTheHillPeople@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

"If I have to create stories so that the American media actually pays attention to the suffering of the American people, then that’s what I’m going to do."

VanceGPT

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Sounds an awful lot like some coworkers

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LLMs have their flaws but for my use it's usually good enough. It's rarely mission critical information that I'm looking for. It satisfies my thirst for an answer and even if it's wrong I'm probably going to forget it in a few hours anyway. If it's something important I'll start with chatGPT and then fact check it by looking up the information myself.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So, let me get this straight...you "thirst for an answer", but you don't care whether or not the answer is correct?

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

this is like addiction to youtube "top 10 facts" and whatever similar videos

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course I care whether the answer is correct. My point was that even when it’s not, it doesn’t really matter much because if it were critical, I wouldn’t be asking ChatGPT in the first place. More often than not, the answer it gives me is correct. The occasional hallucination is a price I’m willing to pay for the huge convenience of having something like ChatGPT to quickly bounce ideas off of and ask about stuff.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I agree that AI can be helpful for bouncing ideas off of. It's been a great aid in learning, too. However, when I'm using it to help me learn programming, for example, I can run the code and see whether or not it works.

I'm automatically skeptical of anything they tell me, because I know they could just be making something up. I always have to verify.