this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
24 points (60.5% liked)

Technology

59596 readers
3214 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Things may happen once in a while for a completely new technology involving vehicles and driving, but for the long term it is a necessary step to develop something that can save countless more lives.

Do you know how villainous that sounds?

"some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice i'm willing to make."

Yeah, you sounds like a villain from VHS copy of Shrek.

What makes you think that the system will always need to be supervised?

What makes you think a system doesn't need to be supervised? What datacenter doesn't have people readily available to make change and fix bug? What autonomous factory doesn't have people readily available to stop the system and jump in to fix fatal error? What autonomous train system doesn't have failsafe and purposefully build infrastructure to support the automation to be as safe as possible?

What makes you think Tesla done something so good, so brilliant that's better than those enclosed, sandboxed environment, that it doesn't need lidar as a failsafe? What gives Tesla special privilege to throw safety out of the window because of Melon Husk's ego?

If you so desperately trying to save life, here's some suggestion.

[–] Draupnir@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Haha, okay so this is about emotion and your predisposition to hate Elon Musk as well as your fear of new technology.

I guess we are not actually participating in conversation anymore so I will bow out.

Good luck my safety champion. Go drive manual and ensure the world always has a person watching, because people don’t get distracted…right?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 4 points 1 month ago

Ohh so you can't even give me a reason why i should trust something without safety rail, only talk about how safe it is right now, supervised, but didn't elaborate on why steering-less, unsupervised system without redundant safety feature like having a lidar is okay. And i'm the emotional one and not participating. Sure bud.

Go drive manual and ensure the world always has a person watching, because people don’t get distracted…right?

What are you on about? 🤨 You talk about the topic as if everyone driving a Tesla or Melon Husk have the intention to share the technology with every car maker.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

It's interesting to see someone so upset that someone consider safety when driving a 5,000+ lb vehicle.

Usually, people who say "this is about emotion" in a debate or argument are the ones acting fully on their emotions. Oh no, someone is emotional about not wanting to get killed by a tech bro texting or sleeping while their car poorly "drives" them! The horror!