371
submitted 5 days ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Music publishing companies notched another court victory against a broadband provider that refused to terminate the accounts of Internet users accused of piracy. In a ruling on Wednesday, the conservative-leaning US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit sided with the big three record labels against Grande Communications, a subsidiary of Astound Broadband.

The appeals court ordered a new trial on damages because it said the $46.8 million award was too high, but affirmed the lower court's finding that Grande is liable for contributory copyright infringement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 236 points 4 days ago

Exactly what law states internet connections should be terminated for users accused of piracy?

And are we going to selectively enforce this against poor people, or are they going to start demanding the trunk lines feeding AI datacenters be cut as well? (I asked rhetorically).

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 67 points 4 days ago

AI shouldn’t be allowed to touch the internet because it’s basically stealing everything and never giving references which is plagiarism.

[-] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 62 points 4 days ago

Come on, you don't think an industry that habitually uses automated takedown requests regardless of merit would falsely accuse anyone, do you?

[-] Gigasser@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Might be a good idea to torrent whatever you need before the corpos manage to get some law passed that makes it so that isps will have to terminate users for that.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Need a new internet protocol that doesnt use ISPs

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 23 points 4 days ago

You want a protocol that will build physical last-mile connections to peoples' houses?

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago

Well the birds still have to link to the main network somewhere to exchange packets... which I assume would still be an ISP, unless all you want is local mesh networking.

[-] Proposal6114@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 days ago

I just woke up everyone in my house with a giggle fit thanks to you. Yes weed is involved.

That was amazing.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago

what point are you trying to make?

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world -3 points 4 days ago

It can cover a one-kilometer radius

So most of the last mile.

If we try to have cable or telcos do last-mile they'll fuck us as hard as they possibly can, make laws guaranteeing themselves a permanent monopoly, etc.

We need wireless as a backup just to keep those worthless fuckers honest, then we can do a hybrid model with some scattered fiber ONTs terminating into wifi nodes.

What we really need is to string fiber on the power lines, but the telcos and comcast pay the power companies extra to stop that too.

Break the monopoly power and this all comes tumbling down.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 3 days ago

Someone will still have to install and maintain the wireless access points, physically link them to the local network trunk and negotiate for service with the backbone provider... which would just be an ISP, who would sell you access to the WiFi system like a cellular provider.

This isn't a problem that can be solved with technology. Monopolies have to be fixed with government oversight.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

“And then we can do a hybrid model” congratulations you just invented an ISP.

“Then we’ll string wires on poles” congratulations you just invented an ISP again.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago
  1. Actually, you've invented a cooperative.

  2. Actually, you've just made internet access a utility.

Seriously, you seem really oblivious, the issue isn't technology, we basically have magic at this point, the issue is breaking the economic model.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Ok, I still don’t understand how you’ve magically invented access to the Internet Protocol network, but without an Internet Service Provider. Yes, I’ve taken direct action to enable the creation of several WISP networks in the communities I care about. Can you come up with more useless strawmen or do you just want to keep feeling special?

Edit: upon further review it seems like you think infrastructure just magically maintains itself???

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago

This commoditizes wisps, they aren't only in places with LoS, or with special hardware, while still using unlicensed band.

And megaisps have 2 barriers that preserve their market position:

  1. Capital costs

  2. Right of way access they got mostly in the 70s and 80s if not from the original bell rollout

And weren't you the one who particularly said 'last mile'? That's exactly what this is.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 4 days ago

I second this. Anyone know the code reference?

[-] lido@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

Asking the real question.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
371 points (98.9% liked)

News

23153 readers
2879 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS