this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
13 points (65.1% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2602 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dot@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Realistically, there are only two parties that can report this, Hamas/ Iran and Israel.

So, who do you believe in to get the news about the current events related to this war?

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Realistically, Israel could permit third party journalists and investigators back into the conflict zone.

[–] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Letting anyone inside a war zone is a very bad idea. This is why war zones called war zones. Anyone inside a war zone is in an official life danger.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You act like war reporting doesn't have a rich history. This isn't a new concept.

Only one county in the past ~50 years or so has become known for targeting clearly-delineated journalists in war zones.

Well maybe two since the US did it at least once in Afghanistan. But once isn't a pattern.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Very true, I'm certain those who go into war zones are aware of the dangers posed to them. Keeping conflict journalists out despite their knowledge of and willingness to brave those dangers is suspect.

[–] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago

And it totally has nothing to do with the huge # of third party journalists that have been killed by the IDF already despite incredibly clear press markings. It's almost like the IDF wants the ability to control the narrative or something...

[–] Guydht@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And when said reporters die in said war zones, the whole world: "Israel indiscriminately kills reporters"

Make up your mind. You can allow people to enter and risk their lives in war zone even though it's mega dangerous, but don't blame solely one side of a war for the deaths of said reporters. Because that's clearly shows your bias.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

And when said reporters die in said war zones, the whole world: "Israel indiscriminately kills reporters"

Yes, when Israel is the one who shoots, bombs or attacks them.