view the rest of the comments
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
The subset of doctors that overprescribe narcotics because they're getting kickbacks from the drug companies? Fuck 'em. The rest are fine :)
I'm not aware of any bartenders selling narcotics (using the commonly assumed definition of the word) -- unless you're being intentionally obtuse by using the medical definitiion which would include alcohol. In particular, do you refer to your bartender as your narcotics dealer?
I don't refer to anyone with something as ridiculous as "a narcotics dealer".
So you know they all have the power to prescribe narcotics, and they use that power, most using it responsibly, yes? You don't feel that a majority of doctors are a problem, despite them having the capacity to give even small children powerful narcotics? Do you disagree with this?
So it's not the capacity to deal narcotics which you're objecting to. It's the capacity combined with a lack of morality and actively doing bad things. Do you disagree with this?
Alcohol is in every sense of the word a narcotic. That's not me being obtuse, it's you using a word with the intent of it having a certain connotation, and you wish for that connotation to be faaaaar away from a thing it literally describes, even though that thing is the most narcotic of them all, which is something you don't even understand, because you don't even know what "narcotic" means, prescriptively.
So it's not actually inebriation or the dealing of narcotics youre opposed to. You're opposed to people who deal narcotics and have bad morals. Do all illicit drug traders have bad morals?
If you said yes, you're gonna need to read up on the war on drugs. If you did, that's only because you've been programmed to. And it would be much more beneficial for society, drugs users, drinkers, people who are sober, the world over, if we stop it with this asinine "war on drugs" which itself is propping up drug cartels and the crimes that follow.
So if you support the prohibition of drugs, you're literally supporting "the narcotix dealers" you're referring to.
Meow