this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
1300 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

5763 readers
2224 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 80 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (22 children)

We are in no way at risk of dying out from negative population growth. If we start to go down below a few million, then maybe let's talk.

World population is still increasing, and is set to maybe stabilize in a couple decades. Fingers crossed. If we could (gently, without mass starvation) reduce the population down to a more sustainable level, that is an unmitigatedly good thing.

What might kill us is infertility from pollution or disease, but this won't do it.

[–] UNY0N@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (4 children)

I totally agree with you. I just hate all of these "don't have kids" arguments from liberal people. It's not a viable solution, because the fascists and the idiots are gong to have kids. We need at least some sane people to continue on.

But the is all emotional and subjective, I'll admit that. I'm not really thinking about this topic with a clear head anymore.

load more comments (17 replies)