this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
254 points (89.0% liked)

News

23622 readers
4010 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The 25-year-old’s alleged actions in the days after the attack suggest he was not exactly a criminal mastermind. The U.S. Attorney’s Office said Council conducted a series of suspicious internet searches, for phrases like “SECGOV hack,” “telegram swap,” “how can I know for sure if I am being investigated by the FBI,” and “What are the signs you are under investigation by law enforcement or the FBI even if you have not been contacted by them.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cogman@lemmy.world 174 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Clickbait title. Makes it sound like he was arrested for searching the term. He was arrested for hacking the SEC account. He later searched for "how do I know if the FBI is investigating me".

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

Yeah. It's likely that the terms only came up with a wider investigation of the device/network data that the hack originated from.

[–] Spuddlesv2@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No it doesn’t sound like that at all. It sounds like they’re having a bit of a laugh at the fact that he was in fact being investigated by the FBI when he did that search.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yes it does sound like that. The title doesn't suggest that he actually committed crimes. Sorry!

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I recently saw a thread fawning over regular posters without much critical thought to standards for editors in the age of meme-based reporting. The 90s yutes, upset about their aunts' chain mail emails' claims about artificial sweeteners and theology, ran to the Internet in search of Truth but stumbled into a breeding ground for misinformation. Oop!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I did read the article before I posted it. Hence my putting something from way down in the article in the body of my post.

And the headline might be a bit deceptive, but it's not inaccurate.

The article was both amusing and it fit the criteria of news, so what's the problem?

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A better title would have been "Man arrested by FBI for SEC hack had searched 'How to know for sure if you are being investigated by the FBI'."That would eliminate the incorrect implication.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I don't disagree that there could have been a better headline. As I said, it's deceptive. But it's also not inaccurate.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OP used the title from the article. Is that not convention?

[–] Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Yes, it is. But when the article's title is bad, that's more than enough reason to break convention.

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Standards for reporting on Internet forums are the same as for the grocery store tabloids that agitated the forum dwellers to begin with

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What are you even talking about now?

You're on a forum. You are a "forum dweller."

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm still talking about standards of reporting, and pointing out that Internet culture tends to be especially vocal about truth and science while amplifying the same ol' sensationalism and romanticism.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Okay? Well I wasn't doing that. I was posting a bit of news that I thought people would find amusing. It was clear from the headline that it was basically fluff news. You could easily have just skipped it.

[–] NicolaHaskell@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The FOX standard 😂 news when it humiliates the opposition, levity in between

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which "opposition" is this humiliating? People who run crypto scams that hack government accounts?