315
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

In civilized nations, obeying an unlawful order is, itself, unlawful.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which honestly might be one of the most underrated democratic safeguards, on top of just helping prevent atrocities towards other people.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Rules-based order > Ruler-based order

I always think, though not in the context of war crimes, how two friends of mine related in Basic Training that the drill instructors would give them strict orders to not let anyone through on guard duty who didn't meet some criteria or another, and then other instructors would come by and attempt to badger and bamboozle the poor trainee soldier into letting them through (and God help any who was stupid enough to let them through).

Rules can be inflexible, but they're also a barrier against arbitrary abuses. Our abuses have to be regular and systemic, dammit!

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

"Criteria"? Were clown noses involved?

[-] GiveMemes@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not in the US military, and I'm sure others as well. What civilized nations are you referring to? I can only speak to the US, but enlisted soldiers here take a pledge to follow orders, while the officers are actually the ones to take a pledge to uphold the US constitution.

[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Not in the US military

Yes, in the US military.

I can only speak to the US, but enlisted soldiers here take a pledge to follow orders,

To follow orders in accordance with the UCMJ.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

Yeah you're wrong though... UCMJ

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

US soldiers are not pledging to defend the constitution?!

In Germany for instance every soldiers pledges on the constitution. I thought this was the normal way for countries with a democratic constitution.

[-] MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

No, they absolutely do pledge and affirm that. Not sure what that person is talking about. It's definitely, at least on paper, expected for individuals in the military to refuse to follow unlawful orders. What happens in practice is another story. See: entire history of US military action.

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
315 points (97.3% liked)

World News

38894 readers
2596 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS