Games

16944 readers

389 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

630

Baldur's Gate 3 publishing chief calls out Ubisoft's 'broken strategy': If gamers need to get used to not owning games, 'developers must get used to not having jobs' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Larian director of publishing Michael Douse, never one to be shy about speaking his mind, has spoken his mind about Ubisoft's decision to disband the Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown development team, saying it's the result of a "broken strategy" that prioritizes subscriptions over sales.

Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown is quite good. PC Gamer's Mollie Taylor felt it was dragged down by a very slow start, calling it "a slow burn to a fault" in an overall positive review, and it holds an enviable 86 aggregate score on Metacritic. Despite that, Ubisoft recently confirmed that the development team has been scattered to the four winds to work on "other projects that will benefit from their expertise."

This, Douse feels, is at least partially the outcome of Ubisoft's focus on subscriptions over conventional game sales—the whole "feeling comfortable with not owning your game" thing espoused by Ubisoft director of subscriptions Philippe Tremblay earlier this year—and the decision to stop releasing games on Steam, which is far and away the biggest digital storefront for PC gaming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Defining ownership as "can I sell this" is ridiculous

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If you can't dispose of it by selling it to someone else, your don't own it. Notice how even DRM free games are just the purchase of a license and the distributor can revoke your right to use that license? Yeah, do you don't own DRM free games either.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Indeed but being able to dispose of something by selling it does not automatically means you owned it

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless you're acting as a proxy for the owner, yes it does.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

If you buy something out of some guy's trunk in a parking lot, it does not mean that guy owned it before selling it to you.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If that's the definition of ownership we're going with, does the fact that I can sell my steam account mean I do actually own every game on it regardless of DRM? Also, does a lack of a demand for a game degrade your ownership?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You can't though (not by following the terms you agreed to) and Valve can ban you or remove your right to use the license you paid for whenever they want.