this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
981 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 200,000 people had canceled their digital subscriptions by midday Monday, according to two people at the paper with knowledge of internal matters. Not all cancellations take effect immediately. Still, the figure represents about 8% of the paper’s paid circulation of 2.5 million subscribers, which includes print as well. The number of cancellations continued to grow Monday afternoon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

AWS is the big one. And they are indeed somewhat unique in the scale and flexibility that they offer. You could leave them, but then you have to build those services and data centers yourself.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They literally aren't unique at all. Those services are offered by plenty of competitors.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 16 points 2 weeks ago

At better prices, with better service and APIs.

It's like people enjoy the abuse? 🤷‍♂️

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only true competitor is GCP, and Google is trash company too.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Azure, oracle, digital ocean etc. there's 100s of providers of varying sizes.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

No way in hell you’re trying to compare digital ocean to GCP or AWS.

There are technologies that are entirely out of reach until you get to a certain size. Just because you can provision a VM for someone who gives you a credit card doesn’t make you top tier cloud provider.

And azure comes close, but from a technical perspective their offerings are not competitive. Like it’s 2024 and they still don’t have s3 support.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

gcp, azure, hetzner, digitalocean, linode..

[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

100% agreed. Azure too. Honestly Hetzner as well, to a lesser extent

AWS is unique in its high profit margins. Have you explored the world of non-cloud hosting? It's cheap as!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 2 weeks ago

You could pay someone else who wants to create them?