this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
54 points (98.2% liked)

Games

16742 readers
670 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
54
Fandom Lays Off 11 Percent Of Staff, GameSpot Affected. (aftermath.site)
submitted 2 weeks ago by Dot@feddit.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] notnotmike@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you happen to know where in the rules it would list the "level of relevance". I did a cursory read through of the content guidelines but I didn't see anything that would necessarily exclude descriptions of specific video game content, levels, or assets, but I'm no master at Wikipedia - I can't say I've contributed much beyond donations.

Also I did mention those unique features some wikis have. For example, the Old School RuneScape Wiki has some really great calculators, maps, and data collectors, so I'm very happy with those. But for less popular ones where nobody is putting in the work to make the wiki exemplary feels like we may as well save time and not give Fandom money by using Wikipedia

And look and feel I would say is good unless it's a fandom, and then all the look and feel in the world doesn't justify those ads

[–] Grumpy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] notnotmike@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you very much! I wasn't aware of these guidelines so it's interesting to read

I think the notability is a little hard to define, so I could see some discussion happening, especially about more minute details like individual items in games. But it seems like, based on the existence of a Krillin page, that there is at least some precedent for somewhat broader topics

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are alternatives to Fandom which aren't Wikipedia: https://getindie.wiki/

[–] notnotmike@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago

Just added this to my browser this morning, coincidentally! Not sure what thread it was, but I thought it was this one. Thanks for the link though, it'll be a big help