Technology

59357 readers

3767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

217

Is it time to question the yearly release cycle for phones? (lemmy.zip)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So recently I've been seeing the trend where Android OEMs such as Google, Samsung, etc. have been extending their software release times up to like five, six, and seven years after device release. Clearly, phone hardware has gotten to the point where it can support software for that long, and computers have been in that stage for a very long time. From what I can tell, the only OEM that does this currently might be Fairphone.

Edit: The battery is the thing that goes the fastest so manufacturers could just offer new batteries and that would solve a lot of the problem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The whole idea of making phones disposable was stupid from the get go. I'd say that most mid-tier phones from 2017 should be perfectly serviceable for every stupid app being widely used nowadays. High end phones from 7, 8 years ago are still perfectly fine

I mean, even power gamers barely need all the power that the high end phones offer, because mobile games always aim for the low end, with few exceptions.

That fucking Apple started with the stupid shit of gluing the phone, and every other fucking company copied that shit, really pisses me off. 2015 phones could have their backs opened and the battery changed if needed, no need for special tools.

Phones are unlikely to become open, as in owners can actually fuck around with the software and hardware as they'd like, anytime soon. A few try that, but it's unlikely to become mainstream because there's no market pressure

[–] MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, up until about 2 weeks ago I was still using a Pixel 4. It was 5 years old but never felt slow at all.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Still rocking the Pixel3. Waiting on appleSE refresh

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I just went with the $100 Motorola stylus (it has a built in stylus!) and just pay $4/month with 0% interest so I'm paying much less than $100 over two years. These cheaper phones usually hold up better to abuse than more expensive phones. I had the pixle 5a and the screen died just after two years (a known issue) screens for it are more expensive than $100 right now.

[–] pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

4*24=96, you're probably paying exactly $100 over two years.

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Not a huge savings, but still.

another way of looking at it.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What’s the NPV of 24 monthly $4 payments assuming a 4% annual rate of return?

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

At least $3.50