this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
971 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4467 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sanctions were applied after the social media platform delayed compliance with a federal search warrant that required Twitter to hand over Donald Trump's Twitter data without telling the former president about the warrant for 180 days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Geekocracy@lemmy.world 233 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The purpose of a fine is to get compliance, not to punish. The fine was $50,000, doubling every day. So $350,00 dollars means Musk caved after 3 days. Pretty effective tactic by the court.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Powers of two don't fuck around.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Doing a data science degree right now. No. No they do not.

This pointless comment brought to you by poorly optimized flashbacks.

[–] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fine would've hit $40 billion within a few weeks.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that would make his investment underwater

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

$350K might make it underwater?

OceanGate only charged $250k. He could've been underwater with $100k to spare.

[–] hemmes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Uhh, how does a 50k fine that doubles each day come out to 350k?

Day 1: 50,000. Day 2: 100,000. Day 3: 200,000. Day 4: 400,000...

We skipped right over 350...

[–] revlayle@lemm.ee 58 points 1 year ago

I believe it is cumulative.

50k first day

PLUS 100k next day (running total 150k)

PLUS 200k next day (running total 350k)

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The violation is committed every 24h. You do not get a bonus/discount for waiting out. It is added to your already amassed fine. The way you count would mean, that on day 5, they would get a ~50% discount in the fine (paying only 800K instead of the amassed 1.55M)

Day 1: 50K -> 50K = 50K locked in

Day 2: 100K -> 100K + 1st day 50K = 150K locked in

Day 3: 200K -> 200K + 2nd day 100K + 1st day 50K = 350K locked in


Day 4: 400K -> 400K + 3rd day 200K + 2nd day 100K + 1st day 50K = 750K locked in

Day 5: 800K -> 800K + 4th day 400K + 3rd day 200K + 2nd day 100K + 1st day 50K = 1.550.000K locked in

...

Day 6: 1.6M = 3.15M

Day 7: 3.2M = 6.35M

Day 8: 6.4M = 12.75M

Day 9: 12.8M = 25.55M

Day 10: 25.6M = 51.15M

Day 11: 51.2M = 102.35M

Day 12: 102.4M = 204.75M

Day 13: 204.8M = 409.55M

Day 14: 409.6M = 819.15M

Day 15: 819.2M = 1.638B

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

How is that not just standardized and know at the time of the ruling ?

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Unlike the rest of the justice system.